Are we expecting too much from print media? An analysis of newspaper coverage of the 2002 Canadian healthcare reform debate.

News media effects on their audiences are complex. Four commonly cited effects are: informing audiences; agenda-setting; framing; and persuading. The release in autumn 2002 of two reports on options for reforming Canada's healthcare system attracted widespread media attention. We explored the potential for each of the four media effects by examining Canadian newspaper representation of this healthcare policy debate. Clippings were gathered from regional and national newspapers. Two data collection methodologies were employed: the first involved two staggered "constructed weeks" designed to capture thematic news framing styles; the second collected "intensive" or episodic coverage immediately following the report releases. Health reform articles with a financing and/or delivery focus were included. Using a codebook, articles were coded to track article characteristics, tone, healthcare sector and reform themes, and key actors. A greater quantity of episodic (n=341 clippings) versus thematic coverage (n=77) was documented. Coverage type did not vary significantly by newspaper, reporting source (e.g., staff reporter versus staff editorialist) or article type (e.g., news versus letter). Thematic articles were significantly shorter in length compared to episodic clippings. Episodic coverage tended to have a positive tone, while thematic coverage ranged in tone. Most coverage was general in scope. Sector-specific coverage favoured physician and hospital care--the two providers accorded privileged financing arrangements under Canada's universal, provincially administered health-insurance plans. Coverage of healthcare financing arrangements favoured broad discussions of publicly financed healthcare, federal-provincial governmental relations, and the Canada Health Act that governs provincial plans. Governmental actors and the political institutions that they represent were the dominant actors. Professional associations were also visible, but played a less dominant role. Given its non-specific scope, it is unclear how informative this coverage was. The large quantity and short duration of the episodic coverage, and the preponderance of governmental actors, suggests these newspapers acted as conduits for the policy agenda. Differences in framing styles were observed by coverage type, newspaper, reporting source, article length and type of article. Finally, the dominance of governmental actors provided these actors with numerous opportunities to persuade the public.

[1]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-So-Minimal” Consequences of Television News Programs , 1982 .

[2]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79 , 2003 .

[3]  J. F. Scott The Press and Foreign Policy , 1931, The Journal of Modern History.

[4]  M. Brodie Commentary: Impact of Issue Advertisements and the Legacy of Harry and Louise , 2001, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[5]  W. Russell Neuman,et al.  THE THRESHOLD OF PUBLIC ATTENTION , 1990 .

[6]  William J. McGuire,et al.  The Myth of Massive Media Impact: Savagings and Salvagings , 1986 .

[7]  서정헌,et al.  반도체 공정 overview , 2001 .

[8]  J. Arvai,et al.  Print Media Framing of the Environmental Movement in a Canadian Forestry Debate , 2001, Environmental management.

[9]  Shimon Gadir,et al.  Agenda Setting , 1980 .

[10]  J. Swan,et al.  Harry and Louise and Health Care Reform: Romancing Public Opinion , 2001, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[11]  C P Gilmore,et al.  Communicating with the public. , 1970, JAMA.

[12]  M. Brodie,et al.  Media coverage of managed care: is there a negative bias? , 1998, Health affairs.

[13]  D. Stone Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making , 1997 .

[14]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  'Radical blueprint for social change'? Media representations of New Labour's policies on public health. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[15]  John W. Kingdon Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[16]  Roy Romanow,et al.  Building on Values: Report of the Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada [Reports] , 2002 .

[17]  G. Ray Funkhouser,et al.  THE ISSUES OF THE SIXTIES: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY IN THE DYNAMICS OF PUBLIC OPINION , 1973 .

[18]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion , 1993 .

[19]  Stephen Lacy,et al.  The Effectiveness of Random, Consecutive Day and Constructed Week Sampling in Newspaper Content Analysis , 1993 .

[20]  Robert Y. Shapiro,et al.  Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness , 2000 .

[21]  Steven Woloshin,et al.  Press releases: translating research into news. , 2002, JAMA.

[22]  The media vs managed health care: are we seeing a full court press? , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  The Media Matter: A Call for Straightforward Medical Reporting , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  Charles D. Elder,et al.  Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building , 1975 .

[25]  Joel Lexchin,et al.  Drugs in the news: an analysis of Canadian newspaper coverage of new prescription drugs. , 2003, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[26]  P. Day The Media and the Scientific Message , 1997, Journal of health services research & policy.

[27]  M. McCombs Agenda setting function of mass media , 1977 .

[28]  Evert A. Lindquist,et al.  Agenda-Setting Dynamics in Canada , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[29]  Melinda Voss Checking the pulse: Midwestern reporters' opinions on their ability to report health care news. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[30]  A. L. Otten The influence of the mass media on health policy. , 1992, Health affairs.

[31]  P. Shoemaker Communication Campaigns about Drugs : Government, Media, and the Public , 1989 .

[32]  S B Soumerai,et al.  Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  W. Godwin Article in Press , 2000 .

[34]  E. Benelli The role of the media in steering public opinion on healthcare issues. , 2003, Health policy.

[35]  A. Downs Up and Down with Ecology--The Issue Attention Cycle , 1972 .

[36]  S. Iyengar Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[37]  David A. Rochefort,et al.  Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. By Howlett Michael and Ramesh M.. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1995. 239p. $28.00. , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[38]  L. Jacobs Commentary: Manipulators and Manipulation: Public Opinion in a Representative Democracy , 2001, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[39]  Clive Seale,et al.  Health and media: an overview. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[40]  William J. Gonzenbach The Media, the President, and Public Opinion: A Longitudinal Analysis of the Drug Issue, 1984-1991 , 1995 .

[41]  Harold G. Wolff,et al.  Social Science in Medicine , 1955, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[42]  P. Burstein The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda , 2003 .

[43]  Ellen Wartella,et al.  Mass Communication Review Yearbook , 1987 .

[44]  M. Schudson,et al.  THE NEWS MEDIA AS POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS , 2003 .

[45]  Jon Lawrence,et al.  Party, State, and Society: Electoral Behaviour in Britain since 1820 , 1998 .

[46]  L. Lyons,et al.  The Press and Foreign Policy , 1964 .

[47]  S. Morgan,et al.  Canadians confront health care reform. , 2004, Health affairs.

[48]  Wendy Armstrong,et al.  Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada , 2005 .