Network analysis and actor-centred approach — A critical review

The paper refers to the application of actor-centred analytical approaches in forest development policy science. These approaches relate to the analytical features of actors, power, networks as well as formal and informal interests, defined also in Krott's analytical approach. Examples for a methodological framework and methods applied in analytical forest development policy research, are given from the author's own approach. In this paper, the author first anchors these analytical approaches in overall social science research and distincts them from other schools (table). He focuses then, in the ‘methodological discussion’, on how networks, are being perceived in various ways, by different schools, and on the limitations and risks appearing in the development and application of network approaches. The paper provides guidance on how to deal with these limitations and how to apply (analytical) network approaches. Finally conclusions are drawn on how analytical (network) approaches could be further developed or improved.

[1]  Erkki Lehto,et al.  Private or Socialistic Forestry?: Forest Transition in Finland vs. Deforestation in the Tropics , 2012 .

[2]  M. Keating,et al.  How many approaches in the social sciences? An epistemological introduction , 2008 .

[3]  N. C. Bandelow,et al.  Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse , 2014 .

[4]  M. Krott,et al.  Learning from practices — implications of the “practice based approach” for forest and environmental policy research , 2014 .

[5]  K. Farley.  Pathways to forest transition: Local case studies from the Ecuadorian Andes , 2010 .

[6]  Charles Tilly,et al.  Social Movements, 1768–2018 , 2009 .

[7]  P. Aurenhammer.  Climate Aid Will Neither Support Forests nor the Poor: No Hope for Saving the World's Forests , 2013 .

[8]  P. Hill,et al.  Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung , 1992 .

[9]  Bernhard Zangl,et al.  Internationale Organisationen : Politik und Geschichte , 1994 .

[10]  Bonnie H. Erickson,et al.  Some Problems of Inference from Chain Data , 1979 .

[11]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network items and the general social survey , 1984 .

[12]  U. Brand.  Contradictions and crises of neoliberal–imperial globalization and the political opportunity structures for the Global Justice Movements , 2012 .

[13]  P. Vennesson.  Case studies and process tracing : theories and practices , 2012 .

[14]  Nikolaos D. Hasanagas,et al.  Power Factor Typology Through Organizational and Network Analysis: Using environmental policy networks as an illustration , 2004 .

[15]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis , 1979 .

[16]  Antonio Gramsci.  Selections from the prison notebooks , 2020, The Applied Theatre Reader.

[17]  M. Krott,et al.  Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance , 2014 .

[18]  A. Maryudi.  The contesting aspirations in the forests , 2011 .

[19]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Advocacy-Koalitionen, Policy-Wandel und Policy-Lernen: Eine Alternative zur Phasenheuristik , 1993 .

[20]  A. Mather.  Forests of Consumption: Postproductivism, Postmaterialism, and the Postindustrial Forest , 2001 .

[21]  Max Krott,et al.  Forest Policy Analysis , 2005 .

[22]  M. Diani,et al.  Social Movements: An Introduction , 1998 .

[23]  Value and risks of the use of analytical theory in science for forest policy , 2012 .

[24]  B. Wellman.  The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  K. Popper.  Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[26]  T. Rudel.  Is There a Forest Transition? Deforestation, Reforestation, and Development1 , 1998 .

[27]  M. Svampa.  Resource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development , 2012 .

[28]  P. Aurenhammer.  Development Cooperation Policy in Forestry from an Analytical Perspective , 2012, World Forests.

[29]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change , 2005 .

[30]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[31]  Michael Keating,et al.  Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective , 2008 .

[32]  A. Mather,et al.  Recent Asian Forest Transitions in Relation to Forest-Transition Theory , 2007 .

[33]  D. Knoke,et al.  Political Networks: The Structural Perspective , 1992 .

[34]  E. Lambin,et al.  Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change , 2010 .

[35]  N. Woods,et al.  Networks of influence? : developing countries in a networked global order , 2009 .

[36]  D. Jahn.  Einführung in die Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft , 2015 .

[37]  M. Inoue,et al.  Linking outputs and outcomes from devolved forest governance using a Modified Actor-Power-Accountability Framework (MAPAF): Case study from Chilimo forest, Ethiopia , 2014 .

[38]  M. Foucault,et al.  Sicherheit, Territorium, Bevölkerung , 2006 .

[39]  D. Porta.  Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: Comparative analysis: case-oriented versus variable-oriented research , 2008 .