A Comparison of the Eigenvalue Method and The Geometric Mean Procedure for Ratio Scaling

This article evaluates and compares the performance of two ratio scaling methods, the eigenvalue method proposed by Saaty (1977, 1980) and the geometric mean procedure advocated by Williams and Crawford (1980), given random data. The two methods were ex amined in a series of monte carlo simulations for two response methods (direct estimation and constant sum) and various numbers of stimuli and response scales. The sampling distributions of the measures of consist ency of the two methods were tabulated, rules for de tecting and rejecting inconsistent respondents are out lined, and approximation formulas for other designs are derived. Overall, there was a high level of agree ment and correspondence between the results from the two scaling techniques even when the data were ran dom.

[1]  C. Eckart,et al.  The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank , 1936 .

[2]  S S Stevens,et al.  On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. , 1946, Science.

[3]  A. Comrey A proposed method for absolute ratio scaling , 1950, Psychometrika.

[4]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Growth of sensation on seven continua as measured by force of handgrip. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[6]  AN EMPIRICAL APPLICATION OF A NEW CASE OF THE LAW OF COMPARATIVE JUDGMENT , 1963 .

[7]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  A theory of analytical hierarchies applied to political candidacy , 1977 .

[8]  J. Ramsay Maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling , 1977 .

[9]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[10]  R. Kalaba,et al.  A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets , 1979 .

[11]  R. Yager An eigenvalue method of obtaining subjective probabilities , 1979 .

[12]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Right-left asymmetry in an eigenvector ranking procedure , 1979 .

[13]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[14]  Milton Lodge,et al.  Magnitude Scaling: Quantitative Measurement of Opinions , 1981 .

[15]  Roger N. Shepard,et al.  Psychological relations and psychophysical scales: On the status of “direct” psychophysical measurement ☆ , 1981 .

[16]  K. Berka Theory of Scales , 1983 .

[17]  R. E. Jensen An alternative scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures , 1984 .

[18]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios , 1984 .

[19]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Scaling binary comparison matrices: A comment on narasimhan's proposal and other methods , 1984 .

[20]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Inconsistency and rank preservation , 1984 .

[21]  P. D. Jong A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for priorities , 1984 .

[22]  A. Rapoport,et al.  A Comparison of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Geometric Mean Procedure for Ratio Scaling , 1987 .