Estimation of Observer Performance for Reduced Radiation Dose Levels in CT: Eliminating Reduced Dose Levels That Are Too Low Is the First Step.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES This study aims to estimate observer performance for a range of dose levels for common computed tomography (CT) examinations (detection of liver metastases or pulmonary nodules, and cause of neurologic deficit) to prioritize noninferior dose levels for further analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using CT data from 131 examinations (abdominal CT, 44; chest CT, 44; head CT, 43), CT images corresponding to 4%-100% of the routine clinical dose were reconstructed with filtered back projection or iterative reconstruction. Radiologists evaluated CT images, marking specified targets, providing confidence scores, and grading image quality. Noninferiority was assessed using reference standards, reader agreement rules, and jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figures of merit. Reader agreement required that a majority of readers at lower dose identify target lesions seen by the majority of readers at routine dose. RESULTS Reader agreement identified dose levels lower than 50% and 4% to have inadequate performance for detection of hepatic metastases and pulmonary nodules, respectively, but could not exclude any low dose levels for head CT. Estimated differences in jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic figures of merit between routine and lower dose configurations found that only the lowest dose configurations tested (ie, 30%, 4%, and 10% of routine dose levels for abdominal, chest, and head CT examinations, respectively) did not meet criteria for noninferiority. At lower doses, subjective image quality declined before observer performance. Iterative reconstruction was only beneficial when filtered back projection did not result in noninferior performance. CONCLUSION Opportunity exists for substantial radiation dose reduction using existing CT technology for common diagnostic tasks.

[1]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study. , 2015, Radiology.

[2]  Katsuyuki Taguchi,et al.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[3]  Geoffrey McLennan,et al.  Assessment of radiologist performance in the detection of lung nodules: dependence on the definition of "truth". , 2009, Academic radiology.

[4]  M. Wintermark,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction reduces patient radiation dose in neuroradiology CT studies , 2014, Neuroradiology.

[5]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved? , 2013, Radiology.

[6]  Takeshi Nakaura,et al.  Detection of Nodules Showing Ground-Glass Opacity in the Lungs at Low-Dose Multidetector Computed Tomography: Phantom and Clinical Study , 2009, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  Frank Dong,et al.  Image Noise, CNR, and Detectability of Low-Contrast, Low-Attenuation Liver Lesions in a Phantom: Effects of Radiation Exposure, Phantom Size, Integrated Circuit Detector, and Iterative Reconstruction. , 2016, Radiology.

[8]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in chest CT--review of available options. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[9]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Answers to Common Questions About the Use and Safety of CT Scans. , 2015, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[10]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  In defense of body CT. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Observer Performance in the Detection and Classification of Malignant Hepatic Nodules and Masses with CT Image-Space Denoising and Iterative Reconstruction. , 2015, Radiology.

[12]  D. Sahani,et al.  Reducing Abdominal CT Radiation Dose With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[13]  D. Hough,et al.  Pilot Study of Detection, Radiologist Confidence and Image Quality With Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction at Half–Routine Dose Level , 2013, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Enterography for Active Inflammatory Terminal Ileal Crohn Disease: Comparison of Full-Dose and Half-Dose Images Reconstructed with FBP and Half-Dose Images with SAFIRE. , 2016, Radiology.

[15]  Wan-Yuo Guo,et al.  How far can the radiation dose be lowered in head CT with iterative reconstruction? Analysis of imaging quality and diagnostic accuracy , 2013, European Radiology.

[16]  M. Shiung,et al.  Development and Validation of a Practical Lower-Dose-Simulation Tool for Optimizing Computed Tomography Scan Protocols , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  K. P. Kim,et al.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  Lifeng Yu,et al.  Observer performance for adaptive, image-based denoising and filtered back projection compared to scanner-based iterative reconstruction for lower dose CT enterography , 2015, Abdominal Imaging.

[19]  David H. Kim,et al.  Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Effect of reduced radiation exposure and iterative reconstruction on detection of low-contrast low-attenuation lesions in an anthropomorphic liver phantom: an 18-reader study. , 2014, Radiology.

[21]  J. Yee,et al.  Accuracy of ct colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers , 2009 .

[22]  D. Hough,et al.  Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in vascular and contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  John M Boone,et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans: how to close our knowledge gaps, monitor and safeguard exposure--proceedings and recommendations of the Radiation Dose Summit, sponsored by NIBIB, February 24-25, 2011. , 2012, Radiology.

[24]  Eric Hachulla,et al.  Effect of Iterative Reconstruction on the Detection of Systemic Sclerosis-related Interstitial Lung Disease: Clinical Experience in 55 Patients. , 2016, Radiology.

[25]  Max Wintermark,et al.  Radiation dose reduction strategy for CT protocols: successful implementation in neuroradiology section. , 2008, Radiology.

[26]  C D Claussen,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction in Head CT: Image Quality of Routine and Low-Dose Protocols in Comparison with Standard Filtered Back-Projection , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[27]  M. Roizen Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening , 2012 .

[28]  J. Boone,et al.  Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations , 2011 .

[29]  R. Simon,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[30]  William Pavlicek,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  Geoffrey D Rubin,et al.  Lung Nodule and Cancer Detection in Computed Tomography Screening , 2015, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[32]  Individualized kV Selection and Tube Current Reduction in Excretory Phase Computed Tomography Urography: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction and the Contribution of Iterative Reconstruction to Image Quality , 2013, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[33]  L. Tanoue Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[34]  A. Christe,et al.  Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography (CT) for detecting and characterizing the most common CT-patterns of pulmonary disease. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[35]  D. Lynch,et al.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. , 2011, Radiology.

[36]  C. McCollough,et al.  Pilot Study of Radiation Dose Reduction for Pediatric Head CT in Evaluation of Ventricular Size , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[37]  Rochester,et al.  Use of Water Equivalent Diameter for Calculating Patient Size and Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in CT: The Report of AAPM Task Group 220. , 2014, AAPM report.

[38]  T. Mulkens,et al.  Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. , 2005, Radiology.