Evaluation of effect of flow stress characteristics of tubular material on forming limit in tube hydroforming process

Abstract The material properties for the analytical and numerical simulation in sheet metal processes, especially in tube hydroforming process, are generally obtained from the uniaxial tensile test of raw sheet material. However, the validation of the formability and reliability of the numerical simulation for the tube hydroforming process arises from the fact that the material characteristics of tubes are different from those of the raw sheet materials. In order to determine the most suitable material property of the tubular material for the evaluation of forming limit on the THF process, the uniaxial tensile test for the specimens of the raw sheet metal and the roll-formed tube and the free bulge test for the roll-formed tubular material are carried out in this paper. The forming limit curves are also derived using plastic instability based on three kinds of necking criteria, which are Hill’s local necking criterion for sheet and Swift’s diffuse necking criteria for sheet and tube, to describe and explain the forming limits for the roll-formed tubular material in the THF process. In order to acquire the informative data on the forming limit curves in the THF process, the loading condition of the free bulge test is controlled. The proper band from nearly necking initiation to nearly bursting initiation has been defined for the roll-formed tubular material in the THF process. It can be concluded that the flow stress of the tubular material should be determined from the actual free bulge test to find the practically valuable forming limit curve for the THF process.

[1]  H. W. Swift.  Plastic instability under plane stress , 1952 .

[2]  Michael J. Worswick,et al.  Prediction of Necking in Tubular Hydroforming Using an Extended Stress-Based Forming Limit Curve , 2007 .

[3]  R. Hill,et al.  On discontinuous plastic states, with special reference to localized necking in thin sheets , 1952 .

[4]  Gorton M. Goodwin,et al.  Application of Strain Analysis to Sheet Metal Forming Problems in the Press Shop , 1968 .

[5]  David W. A. Rees,et al.  Plastic flow in the elliptical bulge test , 1995 .

[6]  Sang-Moon Hwang,et al.  Finite element analysis for bursting failure prediction in bulge forming of a seamed tube , 2004 .

[7]  Beom-Soo Kang,et al.  Analytical and numerical approach to prediction of forming limit in tube hydroforming , 2005 .

[8]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Evaluation of tube formability and material characteristics: hydraulic bulge testing of tubes , 2000 .

[9]  F. Dohmann,et al.  Hydroforming-applications of coherent FE-simulations to the development of products and processes , 2004 .

[10]  Thomas B. Stoughton,et al.  Review of theoretical models of the strain-based FLD and their relevance to the stress-based FLD , 2004 .

[11]  Taylan Altan,et al.  On the characteristics of tubular materials for hydroforming—experimentation and analysis , 2001 .

[12]  Beom-Soo Kang,et al.  Tube size effect on hydroforming formability , 2005 .

[13]  Thomas B. Stoughton,et al.  An experimental and numerical study of necking initiation in aluminium alloy tubes during hydroforming , 2004 .

[14]  M. Worswick,et al.  Prediction of necking of high strength steel tubes during hydroforming—multi-axial loading , 2008 .

[15]  R. Hill.  The mathematical theory of plasticity , 1950 .

[16]  R. Pearce,et al.  Instability and fracture in sheet metal , 1974 .

[17]  Thomas B. Stoughton,et al.  A general forming limit criterion for sheet metal forming , 2000 .

[18]  Abhijit Chandra,et al.  A unified bifurcation analysis of sheet metal forming limits , 2001 .