Enhancing knowledge construction processes within multicriteria decision analysis: The Collaborative Value Modelling framework

Abstract This paper proposes a new Collaborative Value Modelling framework, that combines Delphi and multicriteria decision conferencing, to build widely informed evaluation models. Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is commonly used to help decision-makers and other stakeholders in complex evaluation contexts. Further to the technical soundness and meaningfulness of the methods and tools used, it is critical to design adequate social processes to promote shared understanding around key evaluation issues while capturing multiple stakeholders’ values and perspectives. Multicriteria decision conferencing processes have been typically adopted for collaborative modelling using MCDA methods in decision conferences with relatively small groups. Such a socio-technical approach has proven to be effective, in a variety of contexts, in creating a collaborative environment that enables surfacing individual beliefs, identifying common concerns, managing eventual value conflicts and promoting agreement in group model building. But, extending this framework to broader participatory contexts requires a different design of the social process, in order to ensure that model building captures the full panoply of points of view. This challenge can be tackled by enhancing multicriteria decision conferencing with an all-embracing (Web-)Delphi participatory process. We depart from the existing collaborative knowledge acquisition methodology to design, with the Delphi method, a participatory knowledge construction process that elicits and analyses individual judgemental knowledge from a (very) large and diverse number of stakeholders. The knowledge acquired is then digested by a small group of key-players, in a subsequent decision conferencing, to collaboratively develop a widely informed multicriteria evaluation model. This new Web-Delphi-decision conferencing social setting has been tested already in real complex evaluation contexts using a specific multicriteria method, the Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH), to develop a variety of value modelling activities. We call this socio-technical design the Collaborative Value Modelling framework. Here, we describe its real use to support the construction of value functions, focusing on how the judgemental knowledge collected flows between the participatory and collaborative stages of the framework. Results validate that enhancing MACBETH decision conferencing with an ex ante Web-Delphi process fosters higher participation and collaboration in multicriteria modelling.

[1]  Ilya Ivlev,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of medical devices under uncertainty , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Michael Doyle,et al.  Facilitator's Guide to Participatory Decision-Making , 1998 .

[3]  João Carlos Lourenço,et al.  A Socio-technical Approach for Group Decision Support in Public Strategic Planning: The Pernambuco PPA Case , 2014 .

[4]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[5]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Different paths to consensus? The impact of need for closure on model-supported group conflict management , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Euro Beinat,et al.  Value Functions for Environmental Management , 2014 .

[7]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  ExpertLens: A System for Eliciting Opinions from a Large Pool of Non-Collocated Experts with Diverse Knowledge , 2011 .

[8]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A methodology for knowledge acquisition in a group decision support system environment , 1990 .

[9]  L. Phillips A theory of requisite decision models , 1984 .

[10]  Paula Santana Promoting population health and equity in Europe: from evidence to policy , 2017 .

[11]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Facilitated modelling in operational research , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgment , 1998 .

[13]  John Mingers,et al.  Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies , 1997 .

[14]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[15]  Lawrence D Phillips,et al.  Nuclear Risk Management on Stage: A Decision Analysis Perspective on the UK's Committee on Radioactive Waste Management , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  C. B. E. Costa,et al.  MACBETH — An Interactive Path Towards the Construction of Cardinal Value Functions , 1994 .

[17]  Osvaldo Cairó,et al.  The KAMET II methodology: Knowledge acquisition, knowledge modeling and knowledge generation , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  George Wright,et al.  The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis , 1999 .

[19]  J. Mustajoki,et al.  How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach , 2015 .

[20]  Paul Rogers,et al.  Decide & Deliver: 5 Steps to Breakthrough Performance in Your Organization , 2010 .

[21]  Sinead Keeney The Delphi Technique , 2010 .

[22]  J. Landeta Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences , 2006 .

[23]  Sung-Lin Hsueh A Fuzzy Utility-Based Multi-Criteria Model for Evaluating Households’ Energy Conservation Performance: A Taiwanese Case Study , 2012 .

[24]  G. Stoddart,et al.  What is population health? , 2003, American journal of public health.

[25]  Lihong Peng,et al.  GIS-based study of the spatial distribution suitability of livestock and poultry farming , 2014 .

[26]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Advances in decision analysis : from foundations to applications , 2007 .

[27]  Alun D. Preece,et al.  The development, validation and implementation of knowledge-based systems , 1996 .

[28]  Arnout R. H. Fischer,et al.  The use of Delphi methodology in agrifood policy development: Some lessons learned , 2011 .

[29]  F. Woudenberg An Evaluation of Delphi , 1991 .

[30]  Valentina Ferretti,et al.  From stakeholders analysis to cognitive mapping and Multi-Attribute Value Theory: An integrated approach for policy support , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  F. Hasson,et al.  Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research , 2011 .

[32]  A. Jonoski,et al.  Collaborative Modelling for Informed Decision Making and Inclusive Water Development , 2017, Water Resources Management.

[33]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Web Survey Methodology , 2015 .

[34]  Paula Santana,et al.  Indicators for evaluating European population health: a Delphi selection process , 2018, BMC Public Health.

[35]  H. Bourne,et al.  Voices and values: linking values with participation in OR/MS in public policy making , 2007 .

[36]  B. Fasolo,et al.  Tailoring value elicitation to decision makers' numeracy and fluency: Expressing value judgments in numbers or words , 2014 .

[37]  Fiona Measham,et al.  A new approach to formulating and appraising drug policy: A multi-criterion decision analysis applied to alcohol and cannabis regulation. , 2018, The International journal on drug policy.

[38]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts , 2007, Expert Systems with Applications.

[39]  C. B. E. Costa,et al.  Facilitating bid evaluation in public call for tenders: a socio-technical approach , 2002 .

[40]  Hilde Tobi,et al.  The effect of controlled opinion feedback on Delphi features: Mixed messages from a real-world Delphi experiment , 2016 .

[41]  T. Edwin Chow,et al.  The consensus of local stakeholders and outside experts in suitability modeling for future camp development , 2010 .

[42]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A Group Decision Support Framework for Consensus Ranking of Technical Manager Candidates , 1996 .

[43]  Ching-Cheng Chao,et al.  Quantitative evaluation model of air cargo competitiveness and comparative analysis of major Asia-Pacific airports , 2013 .

[44]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  Incorporating biodiversity assets in spatial planning: Methodological proposal and development of a planning support system , 2008 .

[45]  Steven Breslawski,et al.  Knowledge acquisition for multiple site, related domain expert systems: Delphi process and application , 1996 .

[46]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Past, present, and future of decision support technology , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[47]  Terrance D. Savitsky,et al.  Collaborative learning framework for online stakeholder engagement , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[48]  Roberta M. Roth,et al.  A workshop approach to acquiring knowledge from single and multiple experts , 1990, SIGBDP '90.

[49]  Jaap Van Brakel,et al.  Foundations of measurement , 1983 .

[50]  W. Ulrich,et al.  Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourse , 2003, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[51]  Y. I. Liou,et al.  Collaborative knowledge acquisition , 1992 .

[52]  Jim Berry,et al.  An evaluative model for city competitiveness: Application to UK cities , 2013 .

[53]  L. Franco,et al.  Understanding multi-methodology: Evaluating the perceived impact of mixing methods for group budgetary decisions , 2011 .

[54]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  The selection of technology for late-starters: A case study of the energy-smart photovoltaic industry , 2013 .

[55]  Murray Turoff,et al.  Delphi: A brief look backward and forward , 2011 .

[56]  Eelco van Beek,et al.  Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[57]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[58]  Yuval Shahar,et al.  The more the merrier? Increasing group size may be detrimental to decision-making performance in nominal groups , 2018, PloS one.

[59]  W. Frisby,et al.  Putting “Participatory” into Participatory Forms of Action Research , 2005 .

[60]  S. R. Watson,et al.  Decision Synthesis: The Principles and Practice of Decision Analysis@@@Strategic and Tactical Decisions , 1989 .

[61]  Lai Lai Tung,et al.  Explaining cultural differences in decision conferencing , 2002, CACM.

[62]  Osvaldo Cairó KAMET: A comprehensive methodology for knowledge acquisition from multiple knowledge sources , 1998 .

[63]  Adriana Santarosa Vivacqua,et al.  BOO: Behavior-oriented ontology to describe participant dynamics in collocated design meetings , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[64]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[65]  J. Baron Thinking and Deciding , 2023 .

[66]  Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal,et al.  Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[67]  George Wright,et al.  Improving the Delphi process: Lessons from social psychological research , 2011 .

[68]  Scott Reeves,et al.  Constructing a Sensitizing Definition of Certification in Nursing for Research Purposes: A Hybrid Methodology Using Consensus-Building Approach , 2019, The Journal of nursing administration.

[69]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[70]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[71]  Irene P. Koronaki,et al.  Strategic planning in the electricity generation sector through the development of an integrated Delphi-based multi-criteria evaluation model , 2013 .