How do elite ski jumpers handle the dynamic conditions in imitation jumps?

ABSTRACT We examined the effect of boundary conditions in imitation ski jumping on movement dynamics and coordination. We compared imitation ski jumps with – and without – the possibility to generate shear propulsion forces. Six elite ski jumpers performed imitation jumps by jumping from a fixed surface and from a rolling platform. The ground reaction force vector, kinematics of body segments, and EMG of eight lower limb muscles were recorded. Net joint dynamics were calculated using inverse dynamics. The two imitation jumps differed considerably from each other with regard to the dynamics (moments, forces), whereas the kinematics were very similar. Knee power was higher and hip power was lower on the rolling platform than on the fixed surface. Mean EMG levels were very similar for both conditions, but differences in the development of muscle activity were indicated for seven of eight muscles. These differences are reflected in a subtle difference of the alignment of ground reaction force with centre of mass: the ground reaction force runs continuously close to but behind the centre of mass on the rolling platform and fluctuates around it on the fixed surface. This likely reflects a different strategy for controlling angular momentum.

[1]  Julien Favre,et al.  Measurement of the dynamics in ski jumping using a wearable inertial sensor-based system , 2014, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  Julien Favre,et al.  Characterization of lower-limbs inter-segment coordination during the take-off extension in ski jumping. , 2013, Human movement science.

[3]  Mikko Virmavirta,et al.  Ski jumping takeoff in a wind tunnel with skis. , 2011, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[4]  Z. Svoboda,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of the Take-Off and Start of the Early Flight Phase on a Large Hill (HS-134 m) during the 2009 Nordic World Ski Championships , 2011 .

[5]  Mikko Virmavirta,et al.  Take-off analysis of the Olympic ski jumping competition (HS-106m). , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Hermann Schwameder,et al.  Biomechanics research in ski jumping, 1991–2006 , 2008, Sports biomechanics.

[7]  Maarten F. Bobbert,et al.  From a One-Legged Vertical Jump to the SpeedSkating Push-off : A Simulation Study , 2004 .

[8]  Maarten F. Bobbert,et al.  From a One-Legged Verical Jump to the Speed-Skating Push-off: A Stimulation Study , 2002 .

[9]  M Virmavirta,et al.  Take-off aerodynamics in ski jumping. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Erich Müller,et al.  Biomechanics in ski jumping: A review , 2001 .

[11]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  Mikko Virmavirta,et al.  Techniques Used by Olympic Ski Jumpers in the Transition From Takeoff to Early Flight , 1995 .

[13]  Mikko Virmavirta,et al.  Measurement of take‐off forces in ski jumping , 1993 .

[14]  A. Schwab,et al.  The influence of the biarticularity of the gastrocnemius muscle on vertical-jumping achievement. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Herbert Elftman,et al.  FORCES AND ENERGY CHANGES IN THE LEG DURING WALKING , 1939 .