An example of failure tolerant operation of a kinematically redundant manipulator

The high cost involved in the retrieval and repair of robotic manipulators used for remediating nuclear waste, processing hazardous chemicals, or for exploring space or the deep sea, places a premium on the reliability of the system as a whole. For such applications, kinematically redundant manipulators are inherently more reliable since the additional degrees of freedom (DOF) may compensate for a failed joint. In this work, a redundant manipulator is considered to be fault tolerant with respect to a given task if it is guaranteed to be capable of performing the task after any one of its joints has failed and is locked in place. A method is developed for insuring the failure tolerance of kinematically redundant manipulators with respect to a given critical task. Techniques are developed for analyzing the manipulator's workspace to find regions which are inherently suitable for critical tasks due to their relatively high level of failure tolerance. Then, constraints are imposed on the range of motion of the manipulator to guarantee that a given task is completable regardless of which joint fails. These concepts are illustrated for a PUMA 560 that is used for a three-dimensional positioning task.<<ETX>>

[1]  Joseph R. Cavallaro,et al.  Layered dynamic fault detection and tolerance for robots , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Anthony A. Maciejewski Kinetic limitations on the use of redundancy in robotic manipulators , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Kinematic design of fault tolerant manipulators , 1992 .

[4]  A. A. Maciejewski,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance , 2005 .

[5]  B. Christensen,et al.  Model based, sensor directed remediation of underground storage tanks , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Anthony A. Maciejewski,et al.  The Singular Value Decomposition: Computation and Applications to Robotics , 1989, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  A. A. Maciejewski,et al.  Dexterity optimization of kinematically redundant manipulators in the presence of joint failures , 1994 .

[8]  A. Liegeois,et al.  Automatic supervisory control of the configuration and behavior of multi-body mechanisms , 1977 .

[9]  Charles A. Klein,et al.  Review of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado,et al.  Issues in learning global properties of the robot kinematic mapping , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  J. Burdick On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators: characterization of the self-motion manifolds , 1989 .

[12]  M. Jamshidi,et al.  Robot manipulator control for hazardous waste-handling applications , 1992, J. Field Robotics.

[13]  Charles A. Klein,et al.  Dexterity Measures for the Design and Control of Kinematically Redundant Manipulators , 1987 .