Four dimensions of rules and their correspondence to rule-governed behavior: A taxonomy.

The taxonomy presented takes into account dimensions of an entire contingency arrangement specified in the rule and how these dimensions relate to the listener's behavior. The classification is made according to rule: (a) explicitness, (b) accuracy, (c) complexity, and (d) source. It is argued that the probability that the listener will behave according to a rule depends on the type of rule provided, the context in which the rule is provided, and listener's history with that or other similar rules. Even though manipulations of other types of rules have been conducted in studies of stimulus equivalence, relational frames, and derived stimulus relations, a systematic study of the differential effects of the proposed 16 types of rules on the listener's behavior is recommended.

[1]  W. Buskist,et al.  Effects of Accuracy of Instructions on Human Behavior: Correspondence with Reinforcement Contingencies Matters , 1991 .

[2]  H. Schlinger,et al.  Function-Altering Effects of Contingency-Specifying Stimuli , 1987, The Behavior analyst.

[3]  S. Hayes.  Rule-governed behavior : cognition, contingencies, and instructional control , 1989 .

[4]  R. L. Michael,et al.  Transient effects of acquisition history on generalization in a matching-to-sample task. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  B. Skinner,et al.  An operant analysis of problem solving , 1984, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  Hayne W. Reese.  Rules and rule-governance: Cognitive and behavioristic views. , 1989 .

[7]  W. Buskist,et al.  Interaction between rules and contingencies in the control of human fixed-interval performance. , 1986 .

[8]  B. A. Matthews,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Rule-Governed Behavior , 1989 .

[9]  P. Hineline,et al.  Correlated Hypothesizing and the Distinction between Contingency-Shaped and Rule-Governed Behavior , 1989 .

[10]  E. Ribes-Iñesta,et al.  Interactions of Contingencies and Instructional History on Conditional Discrimination , 1996 .

[11]  Benjamin Kleinmuntz,et al.  Problem solving : research, method and theory , 1967 .

[12]  S. Hayes,et al.  Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. , 1992 .

[13]  M. Vaughan.  Rule-Governed Behavior in Behavior Analysis , 1989 .

[14]  W. S. Verplanck.  Verbal concept “mediators” as simple operants , 1992, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[15]  B. A. Matthews,et al.  Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  J. Michael.  Verbal behavior. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  B. Skinner.  Contingencies of reinforcement : a theoretical analysis , 1969 .

[18]  D. Cerutti,et al.  Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  B. F. Skinner,et al.  The Behavior of the Listener , 1989 .

[20]  S. Hayes,et al.  Rule-Governed Behavior: A Potential Theoretical Framework for Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy , 1982 .

[21]  W. Fremouw,et al.  Normal and normative ethics in behavioral sciences. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[22]  E. K. Morris.  Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis , 1988 .

[23]  M Galizio,et al.  Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: instructional control of human loss avoidance. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.