Active-set sequential quadratic programming with variable probabilistic constraint evaluations for optimization problems under non-Gaussian uncertainties

Abstract Design optimization under random uncertainties are formulated as problems with probabilistic constraints. Calculating these constraints presents a major challenge in the optimization. While most research concentrates on uncertainties that are Gaussian, a great number of uncertainties in the environment are non-Gaussian. In this work, various reliability analyses for non-Gaussian uncertainties within a sequential quadratic programming framework are integrated. An analytical reliability contour (RC) is first constructed in the design space to indicate the minimal distance from the feasible boundary of a design at a desired reliability level. A safe zone contour is then created so as to provide a quick estimate of the RC. At each design iteration reliability analyses of different accuracies are selected based on the level needed, depending on the activity of a constraint. For problems with a large number of constraints and relatively few design variables, such as structural problems, the active set strategies significantly improve efficiency, as demonstrated in the examples.

[1]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Adaption of fast Fourier transformations to estimate structural failure probability , 2003 .

[2]  Charles V. Camp,et al.  Design of Space Trusses Using Ant Colony Optimization , 2004 .

[3]  Yasuhiro Mori,et al.  Probability analysis method using Fast Fourier transform and its application , 1997 .

[4]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[5]  Michael R. Flynn,et al.  The beta distribution – a physically consistent model for human exposure to airborne contaminants , 2004 .

[6]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  A NEW STUDY ON RELIABILITY-BASED DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1999 .

[7]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  First-order concepts in system reliability , 1982 .

[8]  K. K. Choi,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization of problems with correlated input variables using a Gaussian Copula , 2009 .

[9]  K. Breitung Asymptotic Approximations for Probability Integrals , 1994 .

[10]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[11]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  An Adaptive Sequential Linear Programming Algorithm for Optimal Design Problems With Probabilistic Constraints , 2007 .

[12]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Sums, products, and ratios for downton’s bivariate exponential distribution , 2006 .

[13]  R. Rackwitz Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives , 2001 .

[14]  Songqing Shan,et al.  Failure Surface Frontier for Reliability Assessment on Expensive Performance Function , 2006 .

[15]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2003 .

[16]  P. Papalambros,et al.  Monotonicity and active set strategies in probabilistic design optimization , 2006 .

[17]  I. Segal,et al.  Fiducial distribution of several parameters with application to a normal system , 1938, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[18]  Charles V. Camp DESIGN OF SPACE TRUSSES USING BIG BANG–BIG CRUNCH OPTIMIZATION , 2007 .

[19]  B. Youn,et al.  An Investigation of Nonlinearity of Reliability-Based Design Optimization Approaches , 2004 .

[20]  Ove Ditlevsen,et al.  Stochastic model for joint wave and wind loads on offshore structures , 2002 .

[21]  Eric Rogers,et al.  Model building and verification for active control of microvibrations with probabilistic assessment of the effects of uncertainties , 2004 .