A physical phantom for the calibration of three‐dimensional X‐ray microtomography examination

X‐ray microtomography is rapidly gaining importance as a non‐destructive investigation technique, especially in the three‐dimensional examination of trabecular bone. Appropriate quantitative three‐dimensional parameters describing the investigated structure were introduced, such as the model‐independent thickness and the structure model index. The first parameter calculates a volume‐based thickness of the structure in three dimensions independent of an assumed structure type. The second parameter estimates the characteristic form of which the structure is composed, i.e. whether it is more plate‐like, rod‐like or even sphere‐like. These parameters are now experiencing a great diffusion and are rapidly growing in importance. To measure the accuracy of these three‐dimensional parameters, a physical three‐dimensional phantom containing different known geometries and thicknesses, resembling those of the examined structures, is needed. Unfortunately, such particular phantoms are not commonly available and neither does a consolidated standard exist. This work describes the realization of a calibration phantom for three‐dimensional X‐ray microtomography examination and reports an application example using an X‐ray microtomography system. The calibration phantom (external size 13 mm diameter, 23 mm height) was based on various aluminium inserts embedded in a cylinder of polymethylmethacrylate. The inserts had known geometries (wires, foils, meshes and spheres) and thicknesses (ranging from 20 µm to 1 mm). The phantom was successfully applied to an X‐ray microtomography device, providing imaging of the inserted structures and calculation of three‐dimensional parameters such as the model‐independent thickness and the structure model index. With the indications given in the present work it is possible to design a similar phantom in a histology laboratory and to adapt it to the requested applications.

[1]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Direct Three‐Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of Human Cancellous Bone: Microstructural Data from Spine, Femur, Iliac Crest, and Calcaneus , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  W A Kalender,et al.  A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications. , 1992, Medical physics.

[3]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[4]  TOR Hildebrand,et al.  Quantification of Bone Microarchitecture with the Structure Model Index. , 1997, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[5]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  Harrie Weinans,et al.  An improved segmentation method for in vivo microCT imaging. , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  Sasov,et al.  Desktop X‐ray microscopy and microtomography , 1998, Journal of microscopy.

[8]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Micro-tomographic imaging for the nondestructive evaluation of trabecular bone architecture. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[9]  M. Brodt,et al.  Accuracy of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) for assessing area and density of mouse cortical bone. , 2003, Calcified tissue international.

[10]  R D Speller,et al.  Phantoms for evaluating the performance characteristics of bone densitometers. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  S. Goldstein,et al.  The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[13]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[14]  Yi-Xian Qin,et al.  Interrelationship of trabecular mechanical and microstructural properties in sheep trabecular bone. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Massimo Rossi,et al.  3D micro-CT analysis of cancellous bone architecture , 2002, Optics + Photonics.

[16]  P. Kälebo,et al.  Bone Mass Determination from Microradiographs by Computer-Assisted Videodensitometry , 1988, Acta radiologica.

[17]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[18]  I. Hvid,et al.  Quantification of age-related changes in the structure model type and trabecular thickness of human tibial cancellous bone. , 2000, Bone.

[19]  Harrie Weinans,et al.  An Improved Segmentation Method for In Vivo μCT Imaging , 2004 .

[20]  W. Kalender,et al.  A phantom for standardization and quality control in peripheral bone measurements by PQCT and DXA , 1993 .

[21]  F Peyrin,et al.  Synchrotron Radiation Microtomography Allows the Analysis of Three‐Dimensional Microarchitecture and Degree of Mineralization of Human Iliac Crest Biopsy Specimens: Effects of Etidronate Treatment , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  P. Kälebo,et al.  Bone Mass Determination from Microradiographs by Computer-Assisted Videodensitometry , 1988, Acta radiologica.

[23]  A. Sasov Microtomography. I: Methods and equipment , 1987 .

[24]  L Bergmans,et al.  Cervical external root resorption in vital teeth. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[25]  N L Fazzalari,et al.  Mathematical modelling of trabecular bone structure: the evaluation of analytical and quantified surface to volume relationships in the femoral head and iliac crest. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Robert E Guldberg,et al.  Microarchitectural and mechanical characterization of oriented porous polymer scaffolds. , 2003, Biomaterials.