Radiation-Driven Flame Spread Over Thermally-Thick Fuels in Quiescent Microgravity Environments

Microgravity experiments of flame spread over thermally thick fuels were conducterd using foam fuels to obtain low density and low thermal conductivity and thus large spread rate (Sf) compared to dense fuels such as polymethylmethacrylate. This scheme enabled meaningful results to be obtained even in 2.2 s drop tower experiments. It was found that, in contrast to conventional understanding, steady spread can occur over thick fuels in quiescent microgravity environments, especally whenm a radiatively active diluent gas such as CO2 is employed. This is proposed to be due to radiative transfer from the flame to the fel surface that can lead to steady spread even when conductive heat transfer from the flame to the fuel bed is negligible, Radiative effects are more significant under microgravity conditions because the flame thickness is larger and thus the volume of radiating combustion products is larger at microgravity. The effects of oxygen concentration and pressure are shown and the transition from thermally thick to thermally thin behavior with decreasing bed thickness is demonstrated. A simple semiquantiative model of radiationdriven flame spread rates is consistent with experimental observations. Radiative flux measurements confirm the proposed effects of diluent type and gravity level. These results are particularly noteworth considering that the International Space Station employs CO2 fire extinguishers; our results suggest that helium may be a better inerting agent on both mass and mole bases at microgravity even though CO2 is much better on a mole basis at earth gravity.

[1]  C. Fernandez-Pello,et al.  A Unified Analysis of Concurrent Modes of Flame Spread , 1981 .

[2]  Michael A. Delichatsios,et al.  Exact Solution for the Rate of Creeping Flame Spread over Thermally Thin Materials , 1986 .

[3]  Paul D. Ronney,et al.  Lewis number effects on flame spreading over thin solid fuels , 1992 .

[4]  C. Tarifa,et al.  Flame propagation along the interface between a gas and a reacting medium , 1967 .

[5]  A. Carlos Fernandez-Pello,et al.  Flame Spread Modeling , 1984 .

[6]  P. Ronney,et al.  Modified Fourier transform method for interferogram fringe pattern analysis. , 1997, Applied optics.

[7]  J. N. De Ris,et al.  Spread of a laminar diffusion flame , 1969 .

[8]  R. Altenkirch,et al.  Determination of the spread rate in opposed-flow flame spread over thick solid fuels in the thermal regime , 1996 .

[9]  F. A. Williams,et al.  Mechanisms of fire spread , 1977 .

[10]  Kenichi Ito,et al.  Effective mechanisms to determine flame spread rate over ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene wire insulation: Discussion on dilution gas effect based on temperature measurements , 2000 .

[11]  Indrek S. Wichman,et al.  Theory of opposed-flow flame spread , 1992 .

[12]  K. Sacksteder,et al.  Inherently unsteady flame spread to extinction over thick fuels in microgravity , 1998 .

[13]  Ellen G. Brehob,et al.  Time‐dependent mass loss rate behavior of wall materials under external radiation , 1993 .

[14]  Paul D. Ronney,et al.  Effect of Ambient Atmosphere on Flame Spread at Microgravity , 1998 .

[15]  R. Eichhorn,et al.  Buoyancy effects on flames spreading down thermally thin fuels , 1980 .