Hypothesis Testing with Scanner Data: The Advantage of Bayesian Methods

The author presents a Bayesian method of testing possibly non-nested restrictions in a multivariate linear model and, using store-level scanner data, compares it with classical methods. The Bayesian tests are shown to be either equal or superior to classical tests in terms of objectivity, ease of use, and ease of interpretation. Classical tests lack a natural metric for comparing non-nested models and often employ super models in which the entertained hypotheses are special cases (i.e., nested). Nested classical tests are almost always significant when used with scanner data, making their interpretation problematic. In contrast, large samples cause Bayesian methods to become less dependent on subjective aspects of the prior distribution and therefore more objective.

[1]  J. Dickey The Weighted Likelihood Ratio, Linear Hypotheses on Normal Location Parameters , 1971 .

[2]  Terry Elrod,et al.  Choice Map: Inferring a Product-Market Map from Panel Data , 1988 .

[3]  Dan Horsky,et al.  Market Share Response to Advertising: An Example of Theory Testing , 1977 .

[4]  Sunil Gupta Impact of Sales Promotions on when, what, and how Much to Buy , 1988 .

[5]  Greg M. Allenby A Unified Approach to Identifying, Estimating and Testing Demand Structures with Aggregate Scanner Data , 1989 .

[6]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  A Paired Comparison Nested Logit Model of Individual Preference Structures , 1989 .

[7]  L. Krishnamurthi,et al.  A Model of Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Price Sensitivities , 1988 .

[8]  Naufel J. Vilcassim Note---Extending the Rotterdam Model to Test Hierarchical Market Structures , 1989 .

[9]  J. Geweke,et al.  Antithetic acceleration of Monte Carlo integration in Bayesian inference , 1988 .

[10]  G. Tellis Advertising Exposure, Loyalty, and Brand Purchase: A Two-Stage Model of Choice , 1988 .

[11]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[12]  A. Zellner An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics , 1971 .

[13]  Marlene A. Smith,et al.  Multiple model testing for non-nested heteroskedastic censored regression models , 1983 .

[14]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  Modeling Asymmetric Competition , 1988 .

[15]  Peter E. Rossi Comparison of Alternative Functional Forms in Production , 1985 .

[16]  Robert C. Blattberg,et al.  Price-Induced Patterns of Competition , 1989 .

[17]  J. Berger,et al.  Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence , 1987 .

[18]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[19]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure , 1989 .

[20]  D. Lindley,et al.  Bayes Estimates for the Linear Model , 1972 .

[21]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  An Approach for Tracking Within-Segment Shifts in Market Shares , 1989 .

[22]  J. Quelch,et al.  Consumer Promotions and the Acceleration of Product Purchases , 1985 .

[23]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  Implications of Market Structure for Elasticity Structure , 1988 .

[24]  Lee G. Cooper Competitive Maps: The Structure Underlying Asymmetric Cross Elasticities , 1988 .

[25]  Scott A. Neslin,et al.  A Comparison of Market Share Models and Estimation Procedures , 1984 .

[26]  Steven M. Shugan Estimating Brand Positioning Maps Using Supermarket Scanning Data , 1987 .

[27]  Edward I. Brody,et al.  News: A Decision-Oriented Model for New Product Analysis and Forecasting , 1982 .