Neoadjuvant vinorelbine-capecitabine versus docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early nonresponsive breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio trial.

BACKGROUND Among breast cancer patients, nonresponse to initial neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with unfavorable outcome. We compared the response of nonresponding patients who continued the same treatment with that of patients who switched to a well-tolerated non-cross-resistant regimen. METHODS Previously untreated breast cancer patients received two 3-week cycles of docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2), doxorubicin at 50 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide at 500 mg/m(2) per day (TAC). Patients whose tumors did not decrease in size by at least 50% were randomly assigned to four additional cycles of TAC or to four cycles of vinorelbine at 25 mg/m(2) and capecitabine at 2000 mg/m(2) (NX). The outcome was sonographic response, defined as a reduction in the product of the two largest perpendicular diameters by at least 50%. A difference of 10% or less in the sonographic response qualified as noninferiority of the NX treatment. Pathological complete response was defined as no invasive or in situ residual tumor masses in the breast and lymph nodes. Toxic effects were assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Of 2090 patients enrolled in the GeparTrio study, 622 (29.8%) who did not respond to two initial cycles of TAC were randomly assigned to an additional four cycles of TAC (n = 321) or to four cycles of NX (n = 301). Sonographic response rate was 50.5% for the TAC arm and 51.2% for the NX arm. The difference of 0.7% (95% confidence interval = -7.1% to 8.5%) demonstrated noninferiority of NX (P = .008). Similar numbers of patients in both arms received breast-conserving surgery (184 [57.3%] in the TAC arm vs 180 [59.8%] in the NX arm) and had a pathological complete response (5.3% vs 6.0%). Fewer patients in the NX arm than in the TAC arm had hematologic toxic effects, mucositis, infections, and nail changes, but more had hand-foot syndrome and sensory neuropathy. CONCLUSION Pathological complete responses to both regimens were marginal. Among patients who did not respond to the initial neoadjuvant TAC treatment, similar efficacy but better tolerability was observed by switching to NX than continuing with TAC.

[1]  S. Loibl,et al.  Intensified neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-responding breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio study. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  Hans-Peter Sinn,et al.  Clinical response after two cycles compared to HER2, Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 in independently predicting a pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast , 2008, Breast Cancer Research.

[3]  W. Eiermann,et al.  Pegfilgrastim +/- ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer. Results from the GEPARTRIO study. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  S. Loibl,et al.  Surgical Procedures After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Operable Breast Cancer: Results of the GEPARDUO Trial , 2006, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  Norman Wolmark,et al.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  J. O’Shaughnessy,et al.  Capecitabine/Taxane combination therapy: evolving clinical utility in breast cancer. , 2006, Clinical breast cancer.

[8]  C. Suh,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with infusional 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (iFAC) in locally advanced breast cancer: an early response predicts good prognosis. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  Marek Pawlicki,et al.  Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  J. Blohmer,et al.  Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  J. O’Shaughnessy,et al.  Single-agent capecitabine: a reference treatment for taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer? , 2002, The oncologist.

[12]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: significantly enhanced response with docetaxel. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  L. Zelek,et al.  Weekly vinorelbine is an effective palliative regimen after failure with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.

[14]  W. Eiermann,et al.  Dose-dense doxorubicin, docetaxel, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support with or without tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast: a randomized, controlled, open phase IIb study. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  M. Socinski,et al.  Carboplatin/paclitaxel or carboplatin/vinorelbine followed by accelerated hyperfractionated conformal radiation therapy: a preliminary report of a phase I dose escalation trial from the Carolina Conformal Therapy Consortium. , 2001, The oncologist.

[16]  L D Fisher,et al.  Self-designing clinical trials. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  M. Kaufmann,et al.  Histologische Regression des Mammakarzinoms nach primärer (neoadjuvanter) Chemotherapie , 1994 .

[18]  H. Bloom,et al.  Histological Grading and Prognosis in Breast Cancer , 1957, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  I. Zuna,et al.  In vivo chemosensitivity-adapted preoperative chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer: the GEPARTRIO pilot study. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.