Benchmarking road safety of U.S. states: a DEA-based Malmquist productivity index approach.

In this study, a DEA based Malmquist index model was developed to assess the relative efficiency and productivity of U.S. states in decreasing the number of road fatalities. Even though the national trend in fatal crashes has reached to the lowest level since 1949 (Traffic Safety Annual Assessment Highlights, 2010), a state-by-state analysis and comparison has not been studied considering other characteristics of the holistic national road safety assessment problem in any work in the literature or organizational reports. In this study, a DEA based Malmquist index model was developed to assess the relative efficiency and productivity of 50 U.S. states in reducing the number of fatal crashes. The single output, fatal crashes, and five inputs were aggregated into single road safety score and utilized in the DEA-based Malmquist index mathematical model. The period of 2002-2008 was considered due to data availability for the inputs and the output considered. According to the results, there is a slight negative productivity (an average of -0.2 percent productivity) observed in the U.S. on minimizing the number of fatal crashes along with an average of 2.1 percent efficiency decline and 1.8 percent technological improvement. The productivity in reducing the fatal crashes can only be attributed to the technological growth since there is a negative efficiency growth is occurred. It can be concluded that even though there is a declining trend observed in the fatality rates, the efficiency of states in utilizing societal and economical resources towards the goal of zero fatality is not still efficient. More effective policy making towards increasing safety belt usage and better utilization of safety expenditures to improve road condition are derived as the key areas to focus on for state highway safety agencies from the scope of current research.

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  Omer Tatari,et al.  Sustainability assessment of highways: A Malmquist index of U.S. states , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[3]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[4]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Ramu Ramanathan,et al.  An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis , 2003 .

[6]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Yuan-biao Zhang,et al.  Notice of RetractionRelative efficiency evaluation of Chinese health care system based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) model , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer and Communication Technologies in Agriculture Engineering.

[8]  Mehmet E. Ozbek,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis as a Decision-Making Tool for Transportation Professionals , 2009 .

[9]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[10]  C. Tingvall,et al.  The properties of Safety Performance Indicators in target setting, projections and safety design of the road transport system. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Andrea Filippetti,et al.  The patterns of technological capabilities of countries: A dual approach using composite indicators and data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[12]  R. Färe,et al.  Index numbers : essays in honour of Sten Malmquist , 1998 .

[13]  J. Bi,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: A data envelopment analysis approach , 2008 .

[14]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[16]  James Odeck,et al.  Comparison of data envelopment analysis and deterministic parametric frontier approaches: an application in the Norwegian road construction sector , 2001 .

[17]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[18]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach , 1992 .

[19]  V. Vensel,et al.  Productivity, the Malmquist index and the empirical study of banks in Estonia. Tootlikkus ja Malmquisti indeks Eesti pankade näitel , 2005 .

[20]  Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh,et al.  Undesirable factors in efficiency measurement , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[21]  James Odeck,et al.  Identifying traffic safety best practice: an application of DEA and Malmquist indices , 2006 .

[22]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[23]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification , 2000 .

[24]  Geert Wets,et al.  Combining road safety information in a performance index. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Ki-Hoon Lee,et al.  Measuring corporate sustainability management: A data envelopment analysis approach , 2012 .

[26]  Geert Wets,et al.  Benchmarking road safety: lessons to learn from a data envelopment analysis. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Xiaolong Xue,et al.  Measuring the Productivity of the Construction Industry in China by Using DEA-Based Malmquist Productivity Indices , 2008 .