Mass concentration calculation with the pulse height distribution of aerosols and system calibration

Abstract The pulse height distribution of aerosols, which was measured by an optical particle counter, was applied to inverse aerosol mass concentration. Using the conceptions of equivalent diameters, the feasibility that the pulse height distribution was used to inverse mass concentration was verified theoretically, and then the definition of average mass was introduced. According to the Mie scattering theory, considering particle shape and non-uniformity of intensity distribution in the optical sensing volume, a novel algorithm for mass concentration was proposed based on the theoretical analysis. In this algorithm, we only need to calibrate two coefficients. The Gauss–Newton and the two-step calibration methods were presented. The former method revealed that calibration coefficients calculated with nonlinear regression are related to the range of mass concentration, leading to the instability of the calibration coefficients. Furthermore, though detailed analysis of the problem, the latter method was put forward. The experimental results indicate mass concentrations inversed by the algorithm have high precision.

[1]  Constantinos Sioutas,et al.  Field evaluation of a modified DataRAM MIE scattering monitor for real-time PM2.5 mass concentration measurements , 2000 .

[2]  P. Görner,et al.  Photometer measurement of polydisperse aerosols , 1995 .

[3]  J. Gebhart,et al.  Correlations between gravimetry and light scattering photometry for atmospheric aerosols , 1994 .

[4]  G A Norris,et al.  Associations between air pollution and mortality in Phoenix, 1995-1997. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  Gurumurthy Ramachandran,et al.  Characterizing Indoor and Outdoor 15 Minute Average PM 2.5 Concentrations in Urban Neighborhoods , 2003 .

[6]  F. Lurmann,et al.  Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  Darrin K. Ott,et al.  Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 portable aerosol spectrometer to the TSI 3321 aerodynamic particle sizer for dry particles. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  W C Malm,et al.  Aerosol Light Scattering Measurements as a Function of Relative Humidity , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  P. Hopke,et al.  Measurement of Both Nonvolatile and Semi-Volatile Fractions of Fine Particulate Matter in Fresno, CA , 2006 .

[10]  Stanislav Slosarcik,et al.  Algorithm of nonrespirable dust fraction suppression using an optical transducer of dust mass concentration , 1998, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[11]  Gilmore J. Sem,et al.  Piezoelectric microbalance for monitoring the mass concentration of suspended particles , 1971 .

[12]  M. Brauer,et al.  Air pollution and retained particles in the lung. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  Y. Chan,et al.  Characterisation of chemical species in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols in Brisbane, Australia , 1997 .

[14]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Beta Gauge for Aerosol Mass Measurement , 2001 .