The epidemiologic principles underlying traffic safety study designs.

This article describes the epidemiological principles underlying four observational study designs commonly used to assess traffic safety: the case-control, case-crossover, culpability and quasi-induced exposure designs. We focus in particular on the specific challenges for preventing bias using each design. Whereas recruiting controls representative of the source population poses a special challenge in case-control traffic safety studies, case-crossover designs are prone to recall bias, and culpability and quasi-induced exposure studies can be undermined by difficulties assigning crash responsibility. Using causal diagrams and worked examples, we provide a simple way to teach traffic safety designs to epidemiologists and to encourage proper application of epidemiological principles among researchers designing traffic safety studies.

[1]  S. Greenland Ecologic versus individual-level sources of bias in ecologic estimates of contextual health effects. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  B Ludes,et al.  Comparison of the prevalence of alcohol, cannabis and other drugs between 900 injured drivers and 900 control subjects: results of a French collaborative study. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[3]  James C. Fell,et al.  A summary: 'The role of alcohol, marijuana, and other drugs in the accidents of injured drivers.' , 1982 .

[4]  P Stamatiadis,et al.  Quasi-induced exposure revisited. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  M. Woodward,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Simon J Walter,et al.  Relationship between penalties for road traffic infringements and crash risk in Queensland, Australia: a case-crossover study. , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[7]  S Rajalin,et al.  The connection between risky driving and involvement in fatal accidents. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  R. Voas,et al.  Drug and alcohol involvement in four types of fatal crashes. , 2011, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs.

[9]  J K Wells,et al.  Drugs in fatally injured young male drivers. , 1985, Public health reports.

[10]  A E af Wåhlberg,et al.  Culpable versus non-culpable traffic accidents; what is wrong with this picture? , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[11]  G. Gmel,et al.  Alcohol and cannabis use as risk factors for injury – a case-crossover analysis in a Swiss hospital emergency department , 2009, BMC public health.

[12]  Sven Ove Samuelsen,et al.  Alcohol, psychoactive drugs and fatal road traffic accidents in Norway: a case-control study. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  D F Preusser,et al.  THE INCIDENCE AND ROLE OF DRUGS IN FATALLY INJURED DRIVERS. FINAL REPORT , 1992 .

[14]  Pablo Lardelli-Claret,et al.  Comparison between two quasi-induced exposure methods for studying risk factors for road crashes. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  F. E. Vanosdall,et al.  Prediction of police officers' traffic accident involvement using behavioral observations. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Marilyn A Huestis,et al.  Cannabis effects on driving skills. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  M D Robertson,et al.  Responsibility analysis: a methodology to study the effects of drugs in driving. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Robert B. Voas,et al.  2007 National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers: Alcohol Results , 2009 .

[19]  Neil Pearce,et al.  Case-control studies: basic concepts. , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[20]  J K McLaughlin,et al.  Selection of controls in case-control studies. II. Types of controls. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[21]  Prachi Sanghavi Commentary: culpability analysis won't help us understand crash risk due to cell phones. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.

[22]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Risk of road accident associated with the use of drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from epidemiological studies. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  R. Compton,et al.  Drug and Alcohol Crash Risk , 2015 .

[24]  Joanne E Brady,et al.  Drug use and fatal motor vehicle crashes: a case-control study. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition , 1986 .

[26]  Nikiforos Stamatiadis,et al.  Quasi-induced exposure method: evaluation of not-at-fault assumption. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Richard W Lyles,et al.  Issues with Using Police Citations to Assign Responsibility in Quasi-induced Exposure , 2012 .

[28]  P. Swann,et al.  The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[30]  M. Bédard,et al.  The Impact of Cannabis on Driving , 2007 .

[31]  Pablo Lardelli-Claret,et al.  The influence of passengers on the risk of the driver causing a car collision in Spain. Analysis of collisions from 1990 to 1999. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  H Summala,et al.  Fatal Accidents among Car and Truck Drivers: Effects of Fatigue, Age, and Alcohol Consumption , 1994, Human factors.

[33]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Effects of Mobile Phone Use on Accident Risk , 2011 .

[34]  Xinguo Jiang,et al.  A review of the validity of the underlying assumptions of quasi-induced exposure. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  Pirjo Lillsunde,et al.  Commentary: Why Is the Odds Ratio for Involvement in Serious Road Traffic Accident Among Drunk Drivers in Norway and Finland Higher Than in Other Countries? , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[36]  Cannabis use and traffic injuries. , 2011, Epidemiology.

[37]  N Stamatiadis,et al.  Quasi-induced exposure: methodology and insight. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[38]  G. Smith,et al.  The driver's role in fatal two-car crashes: a paired "case-control" study. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[39]  M C Longo,et al.  The prevalence of alcohol, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines and stimulants amongst injured drivers and their role in driver culpability: part ii: the relationship between drug prevalence and drug concentration, and driver culpability. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  J. Rehm,et al.  Cannabis and traffic collision risk: findings from a case-crossover study of injured drivers presenting to emergency departments , 2014, International Journal of Public Health.

[41]  E Lenguerrand,et al.  Limits of the quasi-induced exposure method when compared with the standard case-control design. Application to the estimation of risks associated with driving under the influence of cannabis or alcohol. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[42]  The unreasonable effectiveness of a biased logistic regression procedure in the analysis of pair-matched case-control studies , 2001 .