Theorizing collaboration practice

This article provides an overview of the theory of collaborative advantage. This is a practice-oriented theory concerned with enhancing practical understanding of the management isssues involved in joint working across organizations. Two contrasting concepts are central to it: collaborative advantage which is concerned with the potential for synergy from working collaboratively; and, collaborative inertia which relates to the often disappointing output in reality. The theory is structured as a set of overlapping themes, which are predominantly issues that practitioners see as causing pain and reward in collaborative situations. Five example themes are discussed: common aims; power; trust; membership structures; and, leadership. It is argued that the theory captures the complexity that underlies collaborative situations and conveys it in a way that seems real to those involved. It aims to empower those involved through legitimising experienced frustration and providing conceptual handles to help address the practical issues involved.

[1]  C. Huxham,et al.  Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage: Dilemmas of Ideology and Pragmatism in the Activities of Partnership Managers , 2003 .

[2]  C. Huxham,et al.  Nurturing Collaborative Relations , 2003 .

[3]  Chris Huxham,et al.  Contrary Prescriptions: Recognizing Good Practice Tensions in Management , 2003 .

[4]  Chris Huxham,et al.  POINTS OF POWER IN INTERORGANIZATIONAL FORMS: LEARNING FROM A LEARNING NETWORK. , 2002 .

[5]  J. Diamond.  Strategies to resolve conflict in partnerships: reflections on UK urban regeneration , 2002 .

[6]  C. Cramton.  Finding common ground in dispersed collaboration. , 2002 .

[7]  Martin Wyatt.  Partnership in health and social care: the implications of government guidance in the 1990s in England, with particular reference to voluntary organisations , 2002 .

[8]  D. Sweeting.  Leadership in Urban Governance: The Mayor of London , 2002 .

[9]  Nicholas Deakin.  Public-Private Partnerships: A UK case study , 2002 .

[10]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Governing Networks in the Hollow State: Contracting out, process management or a combination of the two? , 2002 .

[11]  L. Engberg.  Reviews. Public private partnerships. Theory and practice in international perspective , 2002 .

[12]  Paul Williams,et al.  The Competent Boundary Spanner , 2002 .

[13]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It , 2002 .

[14]  C. Huxham.  The new public management: an action research approach , 2002 .

[15]  Kurt Thurmaier,et al.  Interlocal Agreements as Overlapping Social Networks: Picket–Fence Regionalism in Metropolitan Kansas City , 2002 .

[16]  Eran Vigoda.  From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration , 2002 .

[17]  Chris Huxham,et al.  What makes practitioners tick? Understanding collaboration practice and practising collaborational understanding , 2001 .

[18]  Marilyn. Taylor,et al.  Partnerships and power in community regeneration , 2001, Partnership Working.

[19]  P. Mattessich.  Collaboration: What Makes It Work , 2001 .

[20]  C. Eden,et al.  The Negotiation of Purpose in Multi-Organizational Collaborative Groups , 2001 .

[21]  C. Huxham,et al.  Research design choices for Action Research: comparative case studies from research on inter-organizational collaboration , 2001 .

[22]  C. Huxham,et al.  Leadership In The Shaping And Implementation Of Collaboration Agendas: How Things Happen In A (Not Quite) Joined-Up World , 2000 .

[23]  Ronald W. McQuaid.  The theory of partnership: why have partnerships? , 2000 .

[24]  C. Huxham,et al.  What makes partnerships work , 2000 .

[25]  C. Huxham,et al.  Ambiguity, Complexity and Dynamics in the Membership of Collaboration , 2000 .

[26]  S. Anderson,et al.  Applying Large-Group Interaction Methods in the Planning and Implementation of Major Change Efforts. , 2000 .

[27]  P. M. Jackson,et al.  The Public Manager in 2010: Managing Public Sector Networked Organizations , 2000 .

[28]  C. Lane,et al.  Trust within and between organizations : conceptual issues and empirical applications , 2000 .

[29]  Sue R. Faerman,et al.  UNDERSTANDING INTERORGANIZATIONAL COOPERATION: PUBLIC-PRIVATE COLLABORATION IN REGULATING FINANCIAL MARKET INNOVATION. , 1999 .

[30]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[31]  Bing-Sheng Teng,et al.  Sustaining Strategic Alliances: Options and Guidelines , 1997 .

[32]  Chris Huxham,et al.  Working together: Key themes in the management of relationships between public and non‐profit organizations , 1996 .

[33]  Colin Eden,et al.  Action research for the study of organizations , 1996 .

[34]  R. Kanter.  Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances , 1994 .

[35]  Chris Huxham,et al.  Pursuing Collaborative Advantage , 1993 .

[36]  C. Huxham,et al.  Introducing Collaborative Advantage: Achieving Inter‐organizational Effectiveness through Meta‐strategy , 1992 .

[37]  Joint Management in Community Care , 1991 .

[38]  Robert Kramer,et al.  Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems , 1990 .

[39]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[41]  Alana Northrop,et al.  Public Administration , 1968, The Journal of Politics.