Propofol for adult procedural sedation in a UK emergency department: safety profile in 1008 cases.

BACKGROUND Concerns exist regarding the safe use of propofol by Emergency Physicians for procedural sedation. The World SIVA International Sedation Task Force has recently created an adverse event tool, in an effort to standardize reporting. We present a safety analysis of our use of propofol using this tool. METHOD Propofol was given according to a previously published guideline. We analysed our dedicated departmental sedation database between December 2006 and March 2012 and cross-examined the original sedation chart for each case recorded. We stratified the identified adverse events according to consensus agreement. RESULTS Of the 1008 consecutive cases, we identified 11 sentinel (5 cases of hypoxia, 6 of hypotension), 34 moderate, 25 minor, and 3 minimal risk adverse events. There were no adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our large series of propofol sedations performed by emergency physicians supports the safety of this practice. The sentinel adverse event rate of 1% that we identify prompts review: we will in future emphasize adherence to the reduced 0.5 mg kg(-1) propofol dose in the elderly, and reconsider our use of metaraminol. We believe that our application of the World SIVA adverse event tool sets a benchmark for further studies.

[1]  G. Andolfatto,et al.  Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a randomized double-blind trial. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  C. Chudnofsky,et al.  The utility of high-flow oxygen during emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol: a randomized, controlled trial. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  Henry David,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of ketamine/propofol versus propofol alone for emergency department procedural sedation. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  B. Krauss,et al.  Who owns deep sedation? , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  Warren S. Sandberg,et al.  The incidence of hypoxemia during surgery: evidence from two institutions , 2010, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[6]  G. Lloyd Original author’s response to e-letter , 2009, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[7]  D. Yealy,et al.  Procedural sedation goes Utstein: the Quebec guidelines. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  N. Mathieu,et al.  Is propofol a safe and effective sedative for relocating hip prostheses? , 2008, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[9]  B. Krauss,et al.  Barriers to propofol use in emergency medicine. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  S. Green Propofol in emergency medicine: further evidence of safety , 2007, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[11]  J. Miner,et al.  Clinical practice advisory: Emergency department procedural sedation with propofol. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  B. Krauss,et al.  Fasting and emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia: a consensus-based clinical practice advisory. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[13]  G. Cumberbatch,et al.  Reduction of dislocated hip prosthesis in the emergency department using conscious sedation: a prospective study , 2005, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[14]  E. Swanson,et al.  Propofol for conscious sedation: a case series. , 1995, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[15]  K. Mason,et al.  Adverse event reporting tool to standardize the reporting and tracking of adverse events during procedural sedation: a consensus document from the World SIVA International Sedation Task Force. , 2012, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  A. Anis,et al.  Safety and clinical effectiveness of midazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review. , 2008, Academic Emergency Medicine.

[17]  S. Green Research advances in procedural sedation and analgesia. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.