Reconstruction of severe atrophic jaws with Fresh Frized Bone Allografts: clinical histologic and histomorphometric evaluation.

OBJECTIVES Rehabilitation of maxillary edentulism with implant-supported prostheses has come into common clinical practice. Although autologous bone has osteoinductive, osteoconductive and osteogenetic properties, its use is subject to certain disadvantages such as: Increased morbidity Limited amount of bone harvested from each donor site. AIM The aim of this study is to analyze clinical, histological and histomorphometric results of homologous bone for implantoprosthetic rehabilitation in severe atrophic jaws. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty consecutive patients, 14 female and 6 males, were treated with homologous bone bank. Treatment protocol consist of: first surgycal step, trasversal and vertical volume restore, second surgycal step: screw remove, specimen biopsy and insert implant fixtures. RESULTS Data show that Fresh Frozen Bone Allografts (FFBA) could be a valuable substitute for autologous bone, in as much as histological and histomorphometric results are widely overlapping. CONCLUSIONS Homologous bone is a valuable option for its large availability with a low cost, good versatility, no morbidity at the donor site, shorter surgical time and hospital stay.

[1]  M. Elsalanty,et al.  Reconstruction of Large Mandibular Bone and Soft-Tissue Defect Using Bone Transport Distraction Osteogenesis , 2007, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[2]  R Koole,et al.  Complications in alveolar distraction osteogenesis of the atrophic mandible. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  R. Boniello,et al.  Horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation for implant placement in the aesthetic zone. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  G. Romanos,et al.  Calvarial versus iliac crest for autologous bone graft material for a sinus lift procedure: a histomorphometric study. , 2007, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone grafts and delayed oral implants for the rehabilitation of extremely atrophied maxillae: a 1-9-year clinical follow-up study on humans. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  P. Coulthard,et al.  The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  O. Jensen,et al.  Alveolar segmental sandwich osteotomy for anterior maxillary vertical augmentation prior to implant placement. , 2006, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[8]  K. Schlegel,et al.  Onlay augmentation versus sinuslift procedure in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 5-year comparative longitudinal study. , 2005, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  Pikos Ma Alveolar ridge augmentation with ramus buccal shelf autografts and impacted third molar removal. , 1999 .

[10]  E. Nyström,et al.  Interpositional bone grafting and Le Fort I osteotomy for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla. A two-stage technique. , 1997, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[11]  C. Misch Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  J J Gary,et al.  Rehabilitation with calvarial bone grafts and osseointegrated implants after partial maxillary resection: a clinical report. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  C. Misch,et al.  Reconstruction of maxillary alveolar defects with mandibular symphysis grafts for dental implants: a preliminary procedural report. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  E. Keller,et al.  Prosthetic-surgical reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with iliac bone grafting and tissue-integrated prostheses. , 1987, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  J. Mellonig,et al.  Comparison of bone graft materials. Part I. New bone formation with autografts and allografts determined by Strontium-85. , 1981, Journal of periodontology.

[16]  L. Whitaker,et al.  Membranous vs endochondral bone autografts: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. , 1979, Surgical forum.