A comparative study in the post-operative spine surgeries: Epidural ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine with clonidine for post-operative analgesia

Background: Anaesthesia for spine surgeries is not only concerned with relieving pain during surgeries but also during the post-operative period. A prospective randomised study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of epidural route and to compare the efficacy and clinical profile of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine, in epidural analgesia with special emphasis on their quality of analgesia and the ability to provide the smooth post-operative course. Methods: A total of 60 subjects, 33 were men and 27 were women between the age of 18 and 65 years of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I/II class who underwent spine surgeries were randomly allocated into two groups, ropivacaine + dexmedetomidine (RD) and ropivacaine + clonidine (RC), comprising 30 patients each. Group RD received 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine and 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine while group RC received 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2 μg/kg of clonidine through the epidural catheter. Onset of analgesia, time of peak effect, duration of analgesia, cardiorespiratory parameters, side-effects and need of rescue intravenous (IV) analgesics were observed. Results: The demographic profile and ASA class were comparable between the groups. None of the patients needed rescue analgesics in either group. Group RD had early onset, early peak effect, prolonged duration and stable cardiorespiratory parameters when compared with group RC. The side-effects profile was also comparable with a little higher incidence of nausea and dry mouth in both groups. Conclusion: Epidural route provided acceptable analgesia in spine surgeries and avoided the need of IV analgesics in either group. Dexmedetomidine is a better neuraxial adjuvant compared with clonidine for providing early onset and prolonged post-operative analgesia and stable cardiorespiratory parameters.

[1]  Jiefu Song,et al.  Bacterial Infection in Deep Paraspinal Muscles in a Parturient Following Epidural Analgesia , 2015, Medicine.

[2]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  Methods to decrease postoperative infections following posterior cervical spine surgery. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  A. Hasan,et al.  Comparative evaluation of epidural bupivacaine - dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine -fentanyl on Doppler velocimetry of uterine and umbilical arteries during labor. , 2012, Journal of prenatal medicine.

[4]  K. Fares,et al.  Efficacy of intrathecally administered dexmedetomidine versus dexmedetomidine with fentanyl in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. , 2012, Pain physician.

[5]  H. Das,et al.  Comparison of caudal analgesia between ropivacaine and ropivacaine with clonidine in children: A randomized controlled trial , 2012, Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia.

[6]  Varshali M Keniya,et al.  Comparison of dexmedetomidine and clonidine (α2 agonist drugs) as an adjuvant to local anaesthesia in supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A randomised double-blind prospective study , 2012, Indian journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  Sasima Dusitkasem,et al.  Dexmedetomidine compare with fentanyl for postoperative analgesia in outpatient gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. , 2012, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[8]  S. Bajwa,et al.  Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl for epidural analgesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries , 2011, Saudi journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  Anita Singh,et al.  Dexmedetomidine and clonidine in epidural anaesthesia: A comparative evaluation , 2011, Indian journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  S. Bajwa,et al.  Caudal ropivacaine–clonidine: A better post-operative analgesic approach , 2010, Indian journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  C. Clark,et al.  Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia in adolescent scoliosis surgery: a meta‐analysis , 2010, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[12]  A. El-hennawy,et al.  Addition of clonidine or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine prolongs caudal analgesia in children. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  A. Farmery,et al.  The Analgesic Effect of Epidural Clonidine After Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  M. Tekin,et al.  Effects of dexmedetomidine on the duration of anaesthesia and wakefulness in bupivacaine epidural block , 2007, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[15]  I. Kara,et al.  297. The comparison of intratechal isobaric ropivacaine and isobaric ropivacaine-clonidine for caesarean delivery , 2006, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[16]  A. Baraka,et al.  Effect of low‐dose dexmedetomidine or clonidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine spinal block , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[17]  C. Ames,et al.  Safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in neurosurgical patients , 2006, Brain injury.

[18]  T. B. Schnaider,et al.  [Intraoperative analgesic effect of epidural ketamine, clonidine or dexmedetomidine for upper abdominal surgery.]. , 2005, Revista brasileira de anestesiologia.

[19]  K. Menon,et al.  Use of Epidural Analgesia for Pain Management after Major Spinal Surgery , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[20]  G. Rechtine,et al.  Postoperative laminectomy pain control using bupivacaine and epidural morphine. , 1986, Orthopedics.

[21]  D. Longrois,et al.  [Dexmedetomidine and clonidine: a review of their pharmacodynamy to define their role for sedation in intensive care patients]. , 2012, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[22]  Senad Ljuca,et al.  Influence of clonidine on the chemodynamic stability and stress response in the course of surgery on general anesthesia. , 2011, Medicinski arhiv.

[23]  Saru Singh,et al.  A comparison of Epidural Butorphanol and Tramadol for Postoperative Analgesia Using CSEA Technique , 2011, Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology.