Protection System Considerations for DC Distributed Electrical Propulsion Systems

Distributed electrical propulsion for aircraft, also known as turbo-electric distributed propulsion (TeDP), will require a complex electrical power system which can deliver power to multiple propulsor motors from gas turbine driven generators. To ensure that high enough power densities are reached, it has been proposed that such power systems are superconducting. Key to the development of these systems is the understanding of how faults propagate in the network, which enables possible protection strategies to be considered and following that, the development of an appropriate protection strategy to enable a robust electrical power system with fault ride-through capability. This paper investigates possible DC protection strategies for a radial DC architecture for a TeDP power system, in terms of their ability to respond appropriately to a DC fault and their impact on overall system weight and efficiency. This latter aspect has already been shown to be critical to shaping the overall TeDP concept competitiveness.

[1]  Michael James Armstrong,et al.  Sensitivity of TeDP Microgrid System Weight and Efficiency to Operating Voltage , 2014 .

[2]  Graeme Burt,et al.  Determination of protection system requirements for dc unmanned aerial vehicle electrical power networks for enhanced capability and survivability , 2011 .

[3]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Weights and Efficiencies of Electric Components of a Turboelectric Aircraft Propulsion System , 2011 .

[4]  Michael J. Armstrong,et al.  Development of voltage standards for turbo-electric distributed propulsion aircraft power systems , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles (ESARS).

[5]  James L. Felder,et al.  Distributed Turboelectric Propulsion for Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft , 2008 .

[6]  James L. Felder,et al.  Sensitivity of Mission Energy Consumption to Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Design Assumptions on the N3-X Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft , 2012 .

[7]  Frede Blaabjerg,et al.  A New Low-Cost, Fully Fault Protected PWM-VSI Inverter with True Phase-Current Information , 1995 .

[8]  P. Kittel,et al.  Cryocooler Performance Estimator , 2007 .

[9]  Graeme Burt,et al.  Modeling and simulation enabled UAV electrical power system design , 2011 .

[10]  C. E. Jones,et al.  Turboelectric distributed propulsion protection system design trades , 2014 .

[11]  P.J. Masson,et al.  Next Generation More-Electric Aircraft: A Potential Application for HTS Superconductors , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[12]  Gerald V. Brown,et al.  Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion in a Hybrid Wing Body Aircraft , 2011 .

[13]  C. E. Jones,et al.  A pre-design sensitivity analysis tool for consideration of full-electric aircraft propulsion electrical power system architectures , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles (ESARS).

[14]  C. E. Jones,et al.  Fault behaviour of a superconducting turboelectric distributed propulsion aircraft network: A comprehensive sensitivity study , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles (ESARS).

[15]  Robert M. Cuzner,et al.  The Status of DC Micro-Grid Protection , 2008, 2008 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[16]  Antonio Lazaro,et al.  SSPC Active Control Strategy by Optimal Trajectory of the Current for Onboard System Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Kaushik Rajashekara,et al.  Trade Studies for NASA N3-X Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion System Electrical Power System Architecture , 2012 .