Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer.

We investigated four theoretical perspectives concerning the role of social comparison (Festinger, 1954) in coping with a threatening event in a sample of breast cancer patients. According to the supercoper perspective, personal contact with comparison others is often unavailable to patients, and contact with media "supercopers"--fellow victims presented as adjusting very smoothly--may make patients feel inadequate by comparison. According to the similarity perspective, patients select comparison targets who are similar to themselves because those comparisons should be the most informative. The upward comparison perspective is predictive of comparisons to relatively advantaged or superior individuals. The downward comparison perspective leads to the prediction that under conditions of threat, individuals make comparisons to people who are inferior or less fortunate in order to enhance their self-esteem. We interviewed 78 breast cancer patients, and results of both closed-ended questions and spontaneously offered comparisons yielded a preponderance of downward comparisons. The results point to the value of using naturalistic methods for studying comparisons, and suggest a more active and cognitive role for social comparison than is usually portrayed.

[1]  D. Ruble,et al.  What children say when the teacher is not around: conflicting goals in social comparison and performance assessment in the classroom. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  A. Burgess,et al.  Rape, crisis and recovery , 1979 .

[3]  A. Arrowood,et al.  The Social Comparison of Ability , 1981 .

[4]  L. Pearlin,et al.  The structure of coping. , 1978, Journal of health and social behavior.

[5]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Evaluating a sex-related ability: Social comparison with similar others and standard setters , 1975 .

[6]  H. Locke,et al.  SHORT MARITAL ADJUSTMENT AND PREDICTION TESTS: THEIR RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY , 1959 .

[7]  R. Schulz,et al.  Long-term adjustment to physical disability: the role of social support, perceived control, and self-blame. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1977 .

[9]  M. Dimatteo,et al.  Interpersonal issues in health care , 1982 .

[10]  L. Derogatis,et al.  Psychological coping mechanisms and survival time in metastatic breast cancer. , 1979, JAMA.

[11]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Stephen R. Wilson,et al.  The effects of self-esteem and situation upon comparison choices during ability evaluation. , 1971 .

[13]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[14]  S. Schachter.  The Psychology Of Affiliation , 1959 .

[15]  T. Wills.  Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[16]  C. Wortman,et al.  Interpersonal Relationships and Cancer: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[17]  J. V. Wood,et al.  It Could Be Worse: Selective Evaluation as a Response to Victimization , 1983 .

[18]  K. L. Hakmiller,et al.  Threat as a determinant of downward comparison , 1966 .

[19]  D. Mechanic.  ILLNESS BEHAVIOR, SOCIAL ADAPTATION, AND THE MANAGEMENT OF ILLNESS: A COMPARISON OF EDUCATIONAL AND MEDICAL MODELS , 1977, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[20]  Shelley E. Taylor.  Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. , 1983 .

[21]  M. Seligman,et al.  Human Helplessness: Theory and Applications , 1980 .