Passive and dynamic gait measures for biped mechanism: formulation and simulation analysis

Understanding and mimicking human gait is essential for design and control of biped walking robots. The unique characteristics of normal human gait are described as passive dynamic walking, whereas general human gait is neither completely passive nor always dynamic. To study various walking motions, it is important to quantify the different levels of passivity and dynamicity, which have not been addressed in the current literature. In this paper, we introduce the initial formulations of Passive Gait Measure (PGM) and Dynamic Gait Measure (DGM) that quantify passivity and dynamicity, respectively, of a given biped walking motion, and the proposed formulations will be demonstrated for proof-of-concepts using gait simulation and analysis. The PGM is associated with the optimality of natural human walking, where the passivity weight functions are proposed and incorporated in the minimization of physiologically inspired weighted actuator torques. The PGM then measures the relative contribution of the stance ankle actuation. The DGM is associated with the gait stability, and quantifies the effects of inertia in terms of the Zero-Moment Point and the ground projection of center of mass. In addition, the DGM takes into account the stance foot dimension and the relative threshold between static and dynamic walking. As examples, both human-like and robotic walking motions during single support phase are generated for a planar biped system using the passivity weights and proper gait parameters. The calculated PGM values show more passive nature of human-like walking as compared with the robotic walking. The DGM results verify the dynamic nature of normal human walking with anthropomorphic foot dimension. In general, the DGMs for human-like walking are greater than those for robotic walking. The resulting DGMs also demonstrate their dependence on the stance foot dimension as well as the walking motion; for a given walking motion, smaller foot dimension results in increased dynamicity. Future work on experimental validation and demonstration will involve actual walking robots and human subjects. The proposed results will benefit the human gait studies and the development of walking robots.

[1]  Guy Bessonnet,et al.  Sagittal gait of a biped robot during the single support phase. Part 1: passive motion , 2001, Robotica.

[2]  Jong H. Park,et al.  ZMP trajectory generation for reduced trunk motions of biped robots , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[3]  Russ Tedrake,et al.  Efficient Bipedal Robots Based on Passive-Dynamic Walkers , 2005, Science.

[4]  Christine Chevallereau,et al.  Design and actuation optimization of a 4-axes biped robot for walking and running , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[5]  Ambarish Goswami,et al.  Postural Stability of Biped Robots and the Foot-Rotation Indicator (FRI) Point , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[6]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Passive dynamic walking model with upper body , 2004, Robotica.

[7]  Amos Albert,et al.  Analytic Path Planning Algorithms for Bipedal Robots without a Trunk , 2003, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[8]  M G Pandy,et al.  Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  M. Pandy,et al.  Dynamic optimization of human walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  Miomir Vukobratovic,et al.  Zero-Moment Point - Thirty Five Years of its Life , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[11]  Joo H. Kim,et al.  Predictive dynamics: an optimization-based novel approach for human motion simulation , 2010 .

[12]  Yannick Aoustin,et al.  Optimal Reference Motions for Walking of a Biped Robot , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Andy Ruina,et al.  A Bipedal Walking Robot with Efficient and Human-Like Gait , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Jong H. Park,et al.  Biped robot walking using gravity-compensated inverted pendulum mode and computed torque control , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[15]  Guy Bessonnet,et al.  Optimal Gait Synthesis of a Planar Biped , 1998 .

[16]  Oliver Urbann,et al.  Observer-based dynamic walking control for biped robots , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  C. Charalambous The Major Determinants in Normal and Pathological Gait , 2014 .

[19]  Aleksandar Pavic,et al.  Experimental identification and analytical modelling of human walking forces: Literature review , 2009 .

[20]  Yujiang Xiang,et al.  Physics-based modeling and simulation of human walking: a review of optimization-based and other approaches , 2010 .

[21]  Christopher L Vaughan,et al.  Theories of bipedal walking: an odyssey. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Guy Bessonnet,et al.  Forces acting on a biped robot. Center of pressure-zero moment point , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[23]  A. Kuo A simple model of bipedal walking predicts the preferred speed-step length relationship. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  A realtime pattern generator for biped walking , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[25]  Joo Hyun Kim,et al.  Prediction and analysis of human motion dynamics performing various tasks , 2006 .

[26]  Guy Bessonnet,et al.  A Parametric Optimization Approach to Walking Pattern Synthesis , 2005, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[27]  Andy Ruina,et al.  Energetic Consequences of Walking Like an Inverted Pendulum: Step-to-Step Transitions , 2005, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[28]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  A Control Approach for Actuated Dynamic Walking in Biped Robots , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[29]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Objective locomotion parameters based inverted pendulum trajectory generator , 2008, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[30]  Y. Nakamura,et al.  Human and humanoid identification from base-link dynamics , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[31]  Teresa Zielinska,et al.  Robot gait synthesis using the scheme of human motions skills development , 2009 .

[32]  Karim Abdel-Malek,et al.  A novel formulation for determining joint constraint loads during optimal dynamic motion of redundant manipulators in DH representation , 2008 .

[33]  Nicolas Andreff,et al.  BIPedal walking: from gait design to experimental analysis , 2004 .

[34]  Jesus Meneses,et al.  Center of percussion and gait design of biped robots , 2010 .

[35]  Mamoru Akiyama,et al.  Simulation of Laminar Flow over a Backward-Facing Step Using the Lattice BGK Method. , 1997 .

[36]  Ranjan Mukherjee,et al.  An Energy Optimal Gait for the MSU Active Synthetic Wheel Biped , 2010 .

[37]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Development of a bipedal humanoid robot having antagonistic driven joints and three DOF trunk , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[38]  Chong-Ho Choi,et al.  An effective trajectory generation method for bipedal walking , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[39]  A. Ruina,et al.  A collisional model of the energetic cost of support work qualitatively explains leg sequencing in walking and galloping, pseudo-elastic leg behavior in running and the walk-to-run transition. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  Manoj Srinivasan,et al.  Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running , 2006, Nature.

[41]  Kazunori Hase,et al.  Development of Three-Diemnsional Whole-Body Musculoskeletal Model for Various Motion Analyses , 1997 .

[42]  Josep M. Font-Llagunes,et al.  Dynamics and energetics of a class of bipedal walking systems , 2009 .

[43]  Marko B. Popovic,et al.  Ground Reference Points in Legged Locomotion: Definitions, Biological Trajectories and Control Implications , 2005, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[44]  C. S. G. Lee,et al.  Robotics: Control, Sensing, Vision, and Intelligence , 1987 .

[45]  Christopher L. Vaughan,et al.  Dynamics of human gait , 1992 .

[46]  Yannick Aoustin,et al.  Optimal reference trajectories for walking and running of a biped robot , 2001, Robotica.

[47]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[48]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective. , 2007, Human movement science.

[49]  Kazuhisa Mitobe,et al.  Control of walking robots based on manipulation of the zero moment point , 2000, Robotica.

[50]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  Planning walking patterns for a biped robot , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[51]  Jan Awrejcewicz,et al.  Analysis of stability of the human gait , 2015 .

[52]  Jian Li,et al.  Energy-efficient gait generation for biped robot based on the passive inverted pendulum model , 2010, Robotica.

[53]  Karim Abdel-Malek,et al.  Planning load-effective dynamic motions of highly articulated human model for generic tasks , 2009, Robotica.