Characterization of m6A modifiers and RNA modifications in uterine fibroids

Uterine leiomyoma or fibroids are the most common prevalent noncancerous tumors of the uterine muscle layer. Common symptoms associated with fibroids include pelvic pain, heavy menstrual bleeding, anemia, and pelvic pressure. These tumors are a leading cause of gynecological care but lack long-term therapy as the origin and development of fibroids are not well understood. Several next-generation sequencing technologies have been performed to identify the underlying genetic and epigenetic basis of fibroids. However, there remains a systemic gap in our understanding of molecular and biological process that define uterine fibroids. Recent epitranscriptomics studies have unraveled RNA modifications that are associated with all forms of RNA and are thought to influence both normal physiological functions and the progression of diseases. We quantified RNA expression profiles by analyzing publicly available RNA-seq data for 15 known epigenetic mediators to identify their expression profile in uterine fibroids compared to myometrium. To validate our findings, we performed RT-qPCR on a separate cohort of uterine fibroids targeting these modifiers confirming our RNA-seq data. We then examined protein profiles of key m6A modifiers in fibroids and their matched myometrium. In concordance with our RNA expression profiles, no significant differences were observed in these proteins in uterine fibroids compared to myometrium. To determine abundance of RNA modifications, mRNA and small RNA from fibroids and matched myometrium were analyzed by UHPLC MS/MS. In addition to the prevalent N6-methyladenosine (m6A), we identified 11 other known modifiers but did not identify any aberrant expression in fibroids. We then mined a previously published dataset and identified differential expression of m6A modifiers that were specific to fibroid genetic sub-type. Our analysis also identified m6A consensus motifs on genes previously identified to be dysregulated in uterine fibroids. Overall, using state-of-the-art mass spectrometry, RNA expression and protein profiles, we characterized and identified differentially expressed m6A modifiers in relation to driver mutations. Despite the use of several different approaches, we identified limited differential expression of RNA modifiers and associated modifications in uterine fibroids. However, considering the highly heterogenous genomic and cellular nature of fibroids, and the possible contribution of single molecule m6A modifications to fibroid pathology, there is a need for greater in-depth characterization of m6A marks and modifiers in a larger and varied patient cohort.

[1]  J. Teixeira,et al.  The Effects of Periostin Expression on Fibroid-Like Transition of Myometrial Cells , 2022, Reproductive Sciences.

[2]  Xiaojing Liu,et al.  Roles of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications in gynecologic cancers: mechanisms and therapeutic targeting , 2022, Experimental Hematology & Oncology.

[3]  Hui Shen,et al.  Transcriptome and DNA methylome analyses reveal underlying mechanisms for the racial disparity in uterine fibroids , 2022, JCI insight.

[4]  S. Jaffrey,et al.  Hidden codes in mRNA: Control of gene expression by m6A. , 2022, Molecular cell.

[5]  T. Chuang,et al.  Differential Expression of Super-Enhancer-Associated Long Non-coding RNAs in Uterine Leiomyomas , 2022, Reproductive Sciences.

[6]  A. Graham,et al.  Loss of the repressor REST affects progesterone receptor function and promotes uterine leiomyoma pathogenesis , 2022, bioRxiv.

[7]  T. Chuang,et al.  Further characterization of tryptophan metabolism and its dysregulation in fibroids. , 2022, F&S science.

[8]  Kathy O. Lui,et al.  Loss of m6A Methyltransferase METTL5 Promotes Cardiac Hypertrophy Through Epitranscriptomic Control of SUZ12 Expression , 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[9]  J. Sun,et al.  YTHDF3 modulates hematopoietic stem cells by recognizing RNA m6A modification on Ccnd1 , 2022, Haematologica.

[10]  Xiang Chen,et al.  Emerging Roles of m6A RNA Methylation Regulators in Gynecological Cancer , 2022, Frontiers in Oncology.

[11]  Jingsong He,et al.  RNA demethylase ALKBH5 in cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutic potential , 2022, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[12]  J. Coon,et al.  Tryptophan 2,3-Dioxygenase-2 in Uterine Leiomyoma: Dysregulation by MED12 Mutation Status , 2022, Reproductive Sciences.

[13]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  Deficient H2A.Z deposition is associated with genesis of uterine leiomyoma , 2021, Nature.

[14]  K. Dong,et al.  m6A Modification: A Double-Edged Sword in Tumor Development , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[15]  T. Chuang,et al.  Tryptophan catabolism is dysregulated in leiomyomas. , 2021, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  Hongchuan Jin,et al.  Linking the YTH domain to cancer: the importance of YTH family proteins in epigenetics , 2021, Cell Death & Disease.

[17]  A. Fazleabas,et al.  Transcriptome Analyses of Myometrium from Fibroid Patients Reveals Phenotypic Differences Compared to Non-Diseased Myometrium , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[18]  T. Chuang,et al.  Functional role of the long noncoding RNA X-inactive specific transcript in leiomyoma pathogenesis. , 2020, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  Yinuo Li,et al.  HMGA2-mediated tumorigenesis through angiogenesis in leiomyoma. , 2020, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  Y. Teng,et al.  Reduced Expression of METTL3 Promotes Metastasis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by m6A Methylation-Mediated COL3A1 Up-Regulation , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[21]  T. Kouzarides,et al.  Role of RNA modifications in cancer , 2020, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[22]  Sung Ho Boo,et al.  The emerging role of RNA modifications in the regulation of mRNA stability , 2020, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

[23]  Sung Ho Boo,et al.  The emerging role of RNA modifications in the regulation of mRNA stability , 2020, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

[24]  A. Baccarelli,et al.  Phthalate Exposures and MicroRNA Expression in Uterine Fibroids: The FORGE Study , 2020, Epigenetics insights.

[25]  Ok Hyun Park,et al.  Molecular Mechanisms Driving mRNA Degradation by m6A Modification. , 2020, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[26]  Q. Lin,et al.  RNA Phosphorothioate Modification in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes. , 2020, ACS chemical biology.

[27]  Hui Shen,et al.  Integrated epigenome, exome and transcriptome analyses reveal molecular subtypes and homeotic transformation in uterine fibroids , 2018, bioRxiv.

[28]  Mehmet Tardu,et al.  Identification and quantification of modified nucleosides in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNAs , 2018, bioRxiv.

[29]  R. Scott,et al.  Proteomic Profiling of Human Uterine Fibroids Reveals Upregulation of the Extracellular Matrix Protein Periostin , 2018, Endocrinology.

[30]  Samie R Jaffrey,et al.  Rethinking m6A Readers, Writers, and Erasers. , 2017, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[31]  T. Lowe,et al.  Small RNA Modifications: Integral to Function and Disease. , 2016, Trends in molecular medicine.

[32]  Chuan He,et al.  Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[33]  Samie R. Jaffrey,et al.  m6A RNA methylation promotes XIST-mediated transcriptional repression , 2016, Nature.

[34]  Chuan He,et al.  Nuclear m(6)A Reader YTHDC1 Regulates mRNA Splicing. , 2016, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[35]  Q. Cui,et al.  SRAMP: prediction of mammalian N6-methyladenosine (m6A) sites based on sequence-derived features , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  Integrated data analysis reveals uterine leiomyoma subtypes with distinct driver pathways and biomarkers , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  C. Leslie,et al.  Cross-talk between PRMT1-mediated methylation and ubiquitylation on RBM15 controls RNA splicing , 2015, eLife.

[38]  S. Temple,et al.  Attomole quantification and global profile of RNA modifications: Epitranscriptome of human neural stem cells , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  Saeed Tavazoie,et al.  HNRNPA2B1 Is a Mediator of m6A-Dependent Nuclear RNA Processing Events , 2015, Cell.

[40]  Christopher E. Mason,et al.  Single-nucleotide resolution mapping of m6A and m6Am throughout the transcriptome , 2015, Nature Methods.

[41]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  Genomics of uterine leiomyomas: insights from high-throughput sequencing. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.

[42]  Samir Adhikari,et al.  Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase , 2014, Cell Research.

[43]  Miao Yu,et al.  A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation , 2013, Nature chemical biology.

[44]  Jonathan K. Pritchard,et al.  Primate Transcript and Protein Expression Levels Evolve Under Compensatory Selection Pressures , 2013, Science.

[45]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  Characterization of uterine leiomyomas by whole-genome sequencing. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  O. Elemento,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of mRNA Methylation Reveals Enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near Stop Codons , 2012, Cell.

[47]  N. Chegini,et al.  miR-200c is aberrantly expressed in leiomyomas in an ethnic-dependent manner and targets ZEBs, VEGFA, TIMP2, and FBLN5 , 2012, Endocrine-related cancer.

[48]  J. Coon,et al.  Role of Stem Cells in Human Uterine Leiomyoma Growth , 2012, PloS one.

[49]  M. Kupiec,et al.  Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq , 2012, Nature.

[50]  J. Segars,et al.  The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[51]  L. Aaltonen,et al.  MED12, the Mediator Complex Subunit 12 Gene, Is Mutated at High Frequency in Uterine Leiomyomas , 2011, Science.

[52]  J. Segars,et al.  The impact of uterine leiomyomas on reproductive outcomes. , 2010, Minerva ginecologica.

[53]  S. Bulun,et al.  Progesterone is essential for maintenance and growth of uterine leiomyoma. , 2010, Endocrinology.

[54]  D. Baird,et al.  Growth of uterine leiomyomata among premenopausal black and white women , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  A. Sandberg Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: leiomyoma. , 2005, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[56]  J. Gregg,et al.  Molecular characterization of uterine fibroids and its implication for underlying mechanisms of pathogenesis. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[57]  K. Kovács,et al.  Comparative analysis of cyclin D1 and oestrogen receptor (α and β) levels in human leiomyoma and adjacent myometrium , 2001 .

[58]  M. Vacher-Lavenu,et al.  Estrogen receptors (ERα/ERβ) in normal and pathological growth of the human myometrium: pregnancy and leiomyoma. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[59]  F. Mitelman,et al.  Characteristic chromosome abnormalities, including rearrangements of 6p, del(7q), +12, and t(12;14), in 44 uterine leiomyomas , 1990, Human Genetics.

[60]  A. Patel,et al.  The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. , 1990, American journal of clinical pathology.

[61]  Y. Okamura,et al.  A comparative study of the estrogen receptor ratio in myometrium and uterine leiomyomas , 1989, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[62]  R. Desrosiers,et al.  Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger RNA from Novikoff hepatoma cells. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  W. N. Goldsmith Leiomyoma , 1932, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[64]  W. Catherino,et al.  Uterine fibroids , 2016, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[65]  W. Rocca,et al.  Reassessing hysterectomy. , 2012, Minnesota medicine.