Using micro-bubbles as acoustic targets for large scale fluid flow experiments

There are many times when it is useful to operate or test acoustic profiling and velocity sensors in laboratory facilities. Unfortunately, the often clean, clear water in such facilities provides little or no backscatter for these instruments to operate. Additional scatterers may be introduced in some cases but this can be unpractical in large facilities or may introduce volumes of particulate matter that are unacceptable. In this note, we describe the use of the Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF) method for creating large quantities of microscopic bubbles to serve as acoustic targets. The advantage of the approach is that it is comparatively inexpensive and does not contaminate the water in any way. A limitation of the approach is that bubbles rise through the water and therefore must be continuously produced. The method is demonstrated in the Institute of Ocean Technology — Ice Tank facility which is 12 m wide, 3 m deep, and 90 m long. In this tank, a large plume of bubbles could be injected at mid-depth and would collectively rise to the surface at a speed of 5 to 10 cm s−1. The rise speed for individual 100 µm bubbles expected from a DAF system is about 1 cm s−1 so it is likely that bubble residence time could be increased by dispersing the bubbles through the water column.

[1]  D. Frye,et al.  Performance of a New Generation of Acoustic Current Meters , 2007 .

[2]  E. M. Barampouti,et al.  Bubble Size Distribution Formed by Depressurizing Air-Saturated Water , 2004 .

[3]  Blair H. Brumley,et al.  Performance of a broad-band acoustic Doppler current profiler , 1991 .

[4]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  The terminal rise velocity of 10-100 microm diameter bubbles in water. , 2008, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[5]  C. Clay,et al.  Acoustical Oceanography : Principles and Applications , 1977 .

[6]  Anton Schleiss,et al.  Improvement of Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry in steady and unsteady turbulent open-channel flows by means of seeding with hydrogen bubbles , 2008 .

[7]  G. Voulgaris,et al.  Evaluation of the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) for Turbulence Measurements , 1998 .

[8]  J. Finch,et al.  A test of the Tate equation to predict bubble size at an orifice in the presence of frother , 2006 .

[9]  Hans van Haren,et al.  Extracting Meaningful Information from Uncalibrated Backscattered Echo Intensity Data , 2010 .

[10]  Ramon Cabrera,et al.  New Acoustic Meter for Measuring 3D Laboratory Flows , 1994 .

[11]  R. Gershey,et al.  Bubble formation at a cylindrical frit surface in a shear field , 1991 .

[12]  R. Miyamoto,et al.  Acoustic Backscatter from Turbulent Microstructure , 1995 .

[13]  G. Appell,et al.  Acoustic Doppler current profiler performance in near surface and bottom boundaries , 1991 .

[14]  James A. Finch,et al.  Controlling bubble size using a frit and sleeve sparger , 2008 .

[15]  Ramon Cabrera,et al.  Performance of a single-beam pulse-to-pulse coherent Doppler profiler , 1996 .

[16]  R. Kashino,et al.  TRIAXYS™ Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Comparison Study , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[17]  E. John Simmonds,et al.  Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[18]  G. F. Appell Design and tests of a real time SonTek ADP system , 1996, OCEANS 96 MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings. The Coastal Ocean - Prospects for the 21st Century.

[19]  U. Lemmin,et al.  Ultrasonic scattering in highly turbulent clear water flow , 1997 .