Synoptic reporting in tumor pathology: advantages of a web-based system.

The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (ACS-CoC) mandates that pathology reports at ACS-CoC-approved cancer programs include all scientifically validated data elements for each site and tumor specimen. The College of American Pathologists (CAP) has produced cancer checklists in static text formats to assist reporting. To be inclusive, the CAP checklists are pages long, requiring extensive text editing and multiple intermediate steps. We created a set of dynamic tumor-reporting templates, using Microsoft Active Server Page (ASP.NET), with drop-down list and data-compile features, and added a reminder function to indicate missing information. Users can access this system on the Internet, prepare the tumor report by selecting relevant data from drop-down lists with an embedded tumor staging scheme, and directly transfer the final report into a laboratory information system by using the copy-and-paste function. By minimizing extensive text editing and eliminating intermediate steps, this system can reduce reporting errors, improve work efficiency, and increase compliance.

[1]  R. Zarbo Interinstitutional assessment of colorectal carcinoma surgical pathology report adequacy. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of practice patterns from 532 laboratories and 15,940 reports. , 1992, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[2]  R. Riddell Recommendations for the reporting of resected large intestinal carcinomas. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. , 1998, Modern Pathology.

[3]  D. Gnepp,et al.  Recommendations for the reporting of larynx specimens containing laryngeal neoplasms , 1997, Virchows Archiv.

[4]  N. Harris,et al.  Standardization of the surgical pathology report. , 1992, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[5]  P J Howanitz,et al.  Interinstitutional comparison of frozen-section consultation. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probe study of 79,647 consultations in 297 North American institutions. , 1991, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[6]  Kempson Rl The time is now. Checklists for surgical pathology reports. , 1992 .

[7]  J. Rosai,et al.  Standardized reporting of surgical pathology diagnoses for the major tumor types. A proposal. The Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. , 1993, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  R. Kempson Checklists for surgical pathology reports. An important step forward. , 1993, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  R. Kempson The time is now. Checklists for surgical pathology reports. , 1992, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.

[10]  W. Murphy Recommendations for the reporting of urinary bladder specimens containing bladder neoplasms , 1996, Virchows Archiv.

[11]  Dr Alistair J. Cochran Recommendations for the reporting of tissues removed as part of the surgical treatment of cutaneous melanoma: Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology , 1998, Pathology international.

[12]  A. Pathology,et al.  Recommendations for the reporting of tissues removed as part of the surgical treatment of cutaneous melanoma , 1997, Virchows Archiv.

[13]  E. Foucar 'Individuality' in the specialty of surgical pathology: self-expression or just another source of diagnostic error? , 2000, The American journal of surgical pathology.