Beyond the buildingcentric approach: A vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings

Abstract The available sustainable building evaluation systems have produced a new environmental design paradigm. However, there is an increasing need to overcome the buildingcentric approach of these systems, in order to further exploit their innovate potential for sustainable building practices. The paper takes this challenge by developing a cross-scale evaluation approach focusing on the reliability of sustainable building design solutions for the context in which the building is situated. An integrated building–urban evaluation model is proposed based on the urban matrix, which is a conceptualisation of the built environment as a social–ecological system. The model aims at evaluating the sustainability of a building considering it as an active entity contributing to the resilience of the urban matrix. Few holistic performance indicators are used for evaluating such contribution, so expressing the building reliability. The discussion on the efficacy of the model shows that it works as a heuristic tool, supporting the acquisition of a better insight into the complexity which characterises the relationships between the building and the built environment sustainability. Shading new lights on the meaning of sustainable buildings, the model can play a positive role in innovating sustainable building design practices, thus complementing current evaluation systems.

[1]  R. Cole,et al.  Motivating change: shifting the paradigm , 2011 .

[2]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[3]  Qiming Li,et al.  A Comparison Study of Mainstream Sustainable/Green Building Rating Tools in the World , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science.

[4]  Simon Guy,et al.  Pragmatic ecologies: situating sustainable building , 2010 .

[5]  Valeria Monno,et al.  Evaluating environmental performances of sustainable technologies: from the building to the city scale , 2011 .

[6]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[7]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Emergy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: Em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability , 2007 .

[8]  Susan Davis,et al.  Green Buildings and Productivity , 2011 .

[9]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Cost premium prediction of certified green buildings: A neural network approach , 2011 .

[10]  Julie Brunner,et al.  Tools for Measuring Progress towards Sustainable Neighborhood Environments , 2009 .

[11]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[12]  I. Fernández,et al.  Environmental assessment in construction using a Spatial Decision Support System , 2009 .

[13]  P. Tuohy,et al.  The role of built environment energy efficiency in a sustainable UK energy economy , 2008 .

[14]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles , 2005 .

[15]  C. S. Holling Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems , 2001, Ecosystems.

[16]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  Analysis of building environment assessment frameworks and their implications for sustainability indicators , 2011 .

[17]  Abdeen Mustafa Omer,et al.  Green energies and the environment , 2008 .

[18]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  International Comparison of Sustainable Rating Tools , 2009 .

[19]  Ricardo Mateus,et al.  Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBTool PTH , 2011 .

[20]  David P. Lawrence,et al.  The need for EIA theory-building , 1997 .

[21]  Derek Clements-Croome,et al.  Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings , 2010 .

[22]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[23]  M. El-Haram,et al.  A framework model for assessing sustainability impacts of urban development , 2009 .

[24]  John Burnett,et al.  City buildings : Eco-labels and shades of green! , 2007 .

[25]  M. Alberti,et al.  Integrating Humans into Ecology: Opportunities and Challenges for Studying Urban Ecosystems , 2003 .

[26]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[27]  Simon Guy,et al.  Reinterpreting Sustainable Architecture: The Place of Technology , 2001 .

[28]  Niklaus Kohler,et al.  Conceptualizing the built environment as a social–ecological system , 2008 .

[29]  Tim Richardson,et al.  Power, knowledge and environmental assessment: the World Bank’s pursuit of ‘good governance’ , 2011 .

[30]  Rachel Becker,et al.  Fundamentals of performance-based building design , 2008 .

[31]  Marita Wallhagen,et al.  Design consequences of differences in building assessment tools: a case study , 2011 .

[32]  Raquel Segurado,et al.  Comparison between EMINENT and other energy technology assessment tools , 2009 .

[33]  A. Wolman THE METABOLISM OF CITIES. , 1965, Scientific American.

[34]  Craig Thomson,et al.  Developing holistic frameworks for the next generation of sustainability assessment methods for the built environment , 2010 .

[35]  Mikkel K. Kragh,et al.  Housing and energy in Denmark: past, present, and future challenges , 2010 .

[36]  Abdeen Mustafa Omer,et al.  Focus on low carbon technologies: The positive solution , 2008 .

[37]  C. Kennedy,et al.  The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[38]  A. Omer Energy, environment and sustainable development , 2008 .

[39]  Grace K C Ding,et al.  Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential , 2011 .

[41]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .