The mere exposure effect is modulated by selective attention but not visual awareness

[1]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Neural evidence for reduced apprehensiveness of familiarized stimuli in a mere exposure paradigm , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[2]  P. Hsieh,et al.  Awareness is necessary for extracting patterns in working memory but not for directing spatial attention. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Duje Tadin,et al.  Understanding Attentional Modulation of Binocular Rivalry: A Framework Based on Biased Competition , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Pop-Out Without Awareness , 2011, Psychological science.

[5]  Chris L. E. Paffen,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Binocular Rivalry , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  A. Finucane.  The effect of fear and anger on selective attention. , 2011, Emotion.

[7]  J. Kawahara,et al.  Distractor devaluation effect in the attentional blink: direct evidence for distractor inhibition. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  J. Yiend.  The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information , 2010 .

[9]  C. Clifford.  Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.

[10]  T. Kikuchi,et al.  Attentional modulation of the mere exposure effect. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Tamara C. Cristescu,et al.  Modelling distractor devaluation (DD) and its neurophysiological correlates , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  J. Tanaka,et al.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[13]  Brian A. Goolsby,et al.  Feature-based inhibition underlies the affective consequences of attention , 2009 .

[14]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Rewards Evoke Learning of Unconsciously Processed Visual Stimuli in Adult Humans , 2009, Neuron.

[15]  Sheng He,et al.  Seeing the invisible: The scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[16]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attention-based perceptual learning increases binocular rivalry suppression of irrelevant visual features. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[17]  Ezequiel Morsella,et al.  The Unconscious Mind , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[18]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Naotsugu Tsuchiya,et al.  Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Self-generated visual imagery alters the mere exposure effect , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Affective Influences of Selective Attention , 2006 .

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: a consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Klaus Kessler,et al.  Attentional Inhibition Has Social-Emotional Consequences for Unfamiliar Faces , 2005, Psychological science.

[26]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry , 2004, Nature.

[27]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Selective Attention Determines Emotional Responses to Novel Visual Stimuli , 2003, Psychological science.

[29]  Harald T. Schupp,et al.  Emotional Facilitation of Sensory Processing in the Visual Cortex , 2003, Psychological science.

[30]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Subliminal Mere Exposure: Specific, General, and Diffuse Effects , 2000, Psychological science.

[32]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  R. Elliott,et al.  Neural Response during Preference and Memory Judgments for Subliminally Presented Stimuli: A Functional Neuroimaging Study , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[35]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis , 1996 .

[37]  R. Bornstein,et al.  The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect , 1994 .

[38]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[40]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[41]  P. Walker.  Binocular rivalry : Central or peripheral selective processes? , 1978 .

[42]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[43]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Emotion Facilitates Perception and Potentiates the Perceptual Benefits of Attention , 2011 .

[44]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement , 2022 .

[45]  © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[46]  W. Levelt.  On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[47]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.