Establishing Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization Efficiency Scale.

Recent evidence has shown that the atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) mechanism can be more complex than generally assumed. In order to better understand the processes in the APCI source, for the first time, an ionization efficiency scale for an APCI source has been created. The scale spans over 5 logIE (were IE is ionization efficiency) units and includes 40 compounds with a wide range of chemical and physical properties. The results of the experiments show that for most of the compounds the ionization efficiency order in the APCI source is surprisingly similar to that in the ESI source. Most of the compounds that are best ionized in the APCI source are not small volatile molecules. Large tetraalkylammonium cations are a prominent example. At the same time, low-polarity hydrocarbons pyrene and anthracene are ionized in the APCI source but not in the ESI source. These results strongly imply that in APCI several ionization mechanisms operate in parallel and a mechanism not relying on evaporation of neutral molecules from droplets has significantly higher influence than commonly assumed.

[1]  R. Antoine,et al.  Transferability of the Electrospray Ionization Efficiency Scale between Different Instruments , 2015, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[2]  A. Fredenhagen,et al.  Evaluation of the optimization space for atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) in comparison with APCI. , 2014, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[3]  I. Leito,et al.  Influence of Water Content on Basicities in Acetonitrile , 2014, Journal of Solution Chemistry.

[4]  I. Leito,et al.  Negative electrospray ionization via deprotonation: predicting the ionization efficiency. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[5]  M. Oss,et al.  Sodium adduct formation efficiency in ESI source. , 2013, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[6]  Michael L. Poltash,et al.  Effect of polar protic and polar aprotic solvents on negative-ion electrospray ionization and chromatographic separation of small acidic molecules. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  W. Buchmann,et al.  APCI/APPI for synthetic polymer analysis. , 2011, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[8]  C. Gagnon,et al.  Comparison of APPI, APCI and ESI for the LC-MS/MS analysis of bezafibrate, cyclophosphamide, enalapril, methotrexate and orlistat in municipal wastewater. , 2011, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[9]  M. Oss,et al.  Electrospray ionization efficiency scale of organic compounds. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  R. Kostiainen,et al.  Effect of eluent on the ionization process in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  L. Ramaley,et al.  Quantitative aspects of and ionization mechanisms in positive-ion atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry , 2008, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[12]  I. Leito,et al.  Towards the electrospray ionization mass spectrometry ionization efficiency scale of organic compounds. , 2008, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.

[13]  N. Cech,et al.  The relative influences of acidity and polarity on responsiveness of small organic molecules to analysis with negative ion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) , 2005, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[14]  D. Desiderio,et al.  LC-MS/MS analysis of peptides with methanol as organic modifier: improved limits of detection. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  E. de Rijke,et al.  Liquid chromatography with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of flavonoids with triple-quadrupole and ion-trap instruments. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[16]  T. Koal,et al.  On the signal response of various pesticides in electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization depending on the flow-rate of eluent applied in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[17]  D. Barceló,et al.  Choosing between atmospheric pressure chemical ionization and electrospray ionization interfaces for the HPLC/MS analysis of pesticides. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  C. Enke,et al.  Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentals. , 2001, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[19]  P. Leonards,et al.  Ultra-trace-level determination of polar pesticides and their transformation products in surface and estuarine water samples using column liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. A.

[20]  W. Niessen,et al.  State-of-the-art in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. A.