The economics of inaction on climate change: a sensitivity analysis

Abstract Economic models of climate change often take the problem seriously, but paradoxically conclude that the optimal policy is to do almost nothing about it. We explore this paradox as seen in the widely used DICE model. Three aspects of that model, involving the discount rate, the assumed benefits of moderate warming, and the treatment of the latest climate science, are sufficient to explain the timidity of the model's optimal policy recommendation. With modifications to those three points, DICE shows that the optimal policy is a much higher and rapidly rising marginal carbon price; and that higher carbon price has a greater effect on physical measures of climate impacts. Our modifications exhibit nonlinear interactions; at least at low discount rates, there is synergy between individual changes to the model. At low discount rates, the inherent uncertainty about future damages looms larger in the analysis, rendering long-run economic modelling less useful. Our analysis highlights the sensitivity of the model to three debatable assumptions; it does not, and could not, lead to a more reliably ‘optimal’ cost of carbon. Cost-effectiveness analysis, focusing on the generally shorter-term cost side of the problem, reduces the economic paradoxes of the long run, and may make a greater contribution than economic optimization modelling.

[1]  C. Hepburn,et al.  Valuing the Future , 2003 .

[2]  M. Weitzman.  Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate , 1998 .

[3]  Talbot Page,et al.  Discounting and intergenerational equity , 1977 .

[4]  W. Cline.  How to Spend $50 Billion to Make the World a Better Place: Meeting the Challenge of Global Warming , 2006 .

[5]  J. Weyant,et al.  Discounting and Intergenerational Equity , 1999 .

[6]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Uncertain discount rates in climate policy analysis , 2004 .

[7]  R. Howarth.  Discounting and Uncertainty in Climate Change Policy Analysis , 2003, Land Economics.

[8]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Discounting, Morality, and Gaming , 1996 .

[9]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming , 2000 .

[10]  M. Schlesinger,et al.  Country-Specific Market Impacts of Climate Change , 2000 .

[11]  Bjørn Lomborg.  Global Crises, Global Solutions , 2004 .

[12]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis , 1996 .

[13]  J. Kasting,et al.  Optimal reductions in CO2 emissions. , 1997, Energy policy.

[14]  S. DeCanio,et al.  Equity effects of alternative assignments of global environmental rights , 2006 .

[15]  G. Heal.  Discounting and Climate Change; An Editorial Comment , 1997 .

[16]  Richard B. Norgaard,et al.  Environmental valuation under sustainable development , 1992 .

[17]  Kevin P Gallagher,et al.  International trade and air pollution: estimating the economic costs of air emissions from waterborne commerce vessels in the United States. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Nicolas Treich,et al.  Risk Aversion, Intergenerational Equity and Climate Change , 2004 .

[19]  F. Joos,et al.  Correcting the carbon cycle representation: How important is it for the economics of climate change? , 1999 .

[20]  C. Hepburn,et al.  Valuing the future: recent advances in social discounting , 2003 .

[21]  Kevin P. Gallagher,et al.  Dirt is in the Eye of the Beholder: The World Bank Air Pollution Intensities for Mexico , 2001 .

[22]  Hans-Peter Weikard,et al.  Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics , 2004 .

[23]  Kenneth C. Shadlen.  Policy Space for Development in the WTO and Beyond: The Case of Intellectual Property Rights , 2005 .

[24]  F. Ramsey,et al.  THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF SAVING , 1928 .

[25]  R. Crisp.  Counting the Cost of Global Warming , 1993 .

[26]  David Maddison,et al.  Climate and Happiness , 2005 .

[27]  W. Cline.  Economics of Global Warming, The , 1992 .

[28]  Stuart W G Derbyshire,et al.  Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Darwin C. Hall,et al.  Integrating economic analysis and the science of climate instability , 2006 .

[30]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty , 2006 .

[31]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Human Well-Being and the Natural Environment , 2002 .

[32]  A. Freeman,et al.  Equity, efficiency, and discounting : The reasons for discounting intergenerational effects , 1977 .

[33]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Intergenerational Equity, Social Discount Rates and Global Warming , 2000 .

[34]  Joanna Isobel House,et al.  Climate change 2001 : synthesis report , 2001 .

[35]  Klaus Keller,et al.  Uncertain climate thresholds and optimal economic growth , 2004 .

[36]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review , 2002 .

[37]  Steve Cohn.  00-06 "Telling Other Stories: Heterodox Critiques of Neoclassical Micro Principles Texts." , 2001 .

[38]  E. Neumayer.  Global Warming: Discounting is Not the Issue, But Substitutability Is , 1999 .

[39]  Mixed signals: market incentives, recycling, and the price spike of 1995 , 2002 .

[40]  R. Tol.  Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change. Part 1: Benchmark Estimates , 2002 .

[41]  G. Heal.  Discounting and Climate Change , 1997 .

[42]  Stephen J. DeCanio,et al.  Economic models of climate change : a critique , 2003 .