A column generation approach for solving generation expansion planning problems with high renewable energy penetration

Abstract The high penetration of renewables envisaged for future power systems will significantly increase the need for flexible operational measures and generation technologies, whose associated investment decisions must be properly planned in the long term. To achieve this, expansion models will need to incorporate unit commitment constraints, which can result in large scale MILP problems that require significant computational resources to be solved. In this context, this paper proposes a novel Dantzig–Wolfe decomposition and a column generation approach to reduce the computational burden and overcome intractability. We demonstrate through multiple case studies that the proposed approach outperforms direct application of commercial solvers, significantly reducing both computational times and memory usage. Using the Chilean power system as a reference case, we also confirm and highlight the importance of considering unit commitment constraints in generation expansion models.

[1]  François Vanderbeck,et al.  On Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition in Integer Programming and ways to Perform Branching in a Branch-and-Price Algorithm , 2000, Oper. Res..

[2]  Rodrigo Palma-Behnke,et al.  A simulation framework for optimal energy storage sizing , 2014 .

[3]  Bryan Palmintier,et al.  Impact of unit commitment constraints on generation expansion planning with renewables , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[4]  Luis F. Ochoa,et al.  Evaluating and planning flexibility in sustainable power systems , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[5]  J. F. Benders Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems , 1962 .

[6]  Mark O'Malley,et al.  Impact of variable generation in generation resource planning models , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[7]  Sarah M. Ryan,et al.  Temporal Versus Stochastic Granularity in Thermal Generation Capacity Planning With Wind Power , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Price-based unit commitment: a case of Lagrangian relaxation versus mixed integer programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Mort D. Webster,et al.  Optimal Selection of Sample Weeks for Approximating the Net Load in Generation Planning Problems , 2013 .

[10]  F.D. Galiana,et al.  Unit commitment with primary frequency regulation constraints , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Ehab F. El-Saadany,et al.  Overview of wind power intermittency impacts on power systems , 2010 .

[12]  Carlos Silva,et al.  High-resolution modeling framework for planning electricity systems with high penetration of renewables , 2013 .

[13]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  Security-constrained expansion planning of fast-response units for wind integration ☆ , 2011 .

[14]  Michel Gendreau,et al.  Interior point stabilization for column generation , 2007, Oper. Res. Lett..

[15]  François Vanderbeck,et al.  Implementing Mixed Integer Column Generation , 2005 .

[16]  Carlos Batlle,et al.  An Enhanced Screening Curves Method for Considering Thermal Cycling Operation Costs in Generation Expansion Planning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  I. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  Markets vs. Regulation: A Role for Indicative Energy Planning , 2008 .

[18]  Michael Milligan,et al.  Operating Reserves and Variable Generation , 2011 .

[19]  Damian Flynn,et al.  The role of power system flexibility in generation planning , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[20]  R. J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Determination of an Optimized Generator Expansion Pattern , 1961, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[21]  George B. Dantzig,et al.  Decomposition Principle for Linear Programs , 1960 .

[22]  R. Kevin Wood,et al.  Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition for Solving Multistage Stochastic Capacity-Planning Problems , 2009, Oper. Res..