EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL HETEROGENEITY IN ESTIMATING THE PERSISTENCE OF SMALL POPULATIONS

Population viability models are commonly used to estimate the probability of pprsistence of smrll, thrcatened, or endangered populations. Demographic, temporal, spatial, and individual heterogeneity are inlportant factors affecting the probability of persistence of small populations. Bccausc stochvstic process are intractable analytically (Ludwig [lSSG]), computer simulation models are often used for estimating population viability via numerical techniques. Although demographic, spatial, and temporal stochast~city have becrl i~icurpulaLcld ir~tu some populat io~~ viability models, individual heterogeneity has not been included. In this pnpw we include individual heterogeneity in a simulation model and examine probabilities of population persistence a t different levels of heterogeneity and population size. Individual heterogencity may incrceae the probability of pelsisleoce of rrrlall populations. The mechanism for the extension in persistence may be explained by natural selection. Genotypes persisting through a decline may be those that survive better under the conditiurla cauhing tlic decline. These individuals that survive and reproduce in the face of adverse conditions may extend the probability ths t a small popnlat,ion persists. I \ 1 ,)11..1I. I , , \ . I l ' l i i l l . . \ 1 11111\1 11111 . . . . . 2 . . . . , . 1 .; .I , I , I . .I,,.., I . . ,,.1..,1."' 1. I . . : ,,I. I , . . I , . . . I t ~ ~ r . ~ . ~ t . i~.c, . ,! . 1 t,; , . I : I . > . ~

[1]  Alan R. Johnson,et al.  Annual Variation in Survival and Breeding Probability in Greater Flamingos , 1996 .

[2]  B. Sæther,et al.  Ecological correlates of individual variation in age at maturity in female moose (Alces alces): the effects of environmental variability , 1993 .

[3]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: A spatially explicit model applied to butterflies , 1994 .

[4]  G. R. Hepp,et al.  Body mass dynamics of wood ducks during incubation: individual variation , 1989 .

[5]  J. S. Griffith,et al.  First-winter survival of rainbow trout and brook trout in the Henrys Fork of the Snake River, Idaho , 1997 .

[6]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Heterogeneous survival rates of mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) , 1992 .

[7]  Roland H. Lamberson,et al.  Reserve Design for Territorial Species: The Effects of Patch Size and Spacing on the Viability of the Northern Spotted Owl* , 1994 .

[8]  Gary C. White,et al.  Compensatory mortality in a Colorado mule deer population , 1992 .

[9]  Donald Ludwig,et al.  The Distribution of Population Survival Times , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[10]  M. Shaffer Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[11]  A. Yashin,et al.  Heterogeneity's ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. , 1985, The American statistician.

[12]  S. Hatch Testing for individual variation in breeding success , 1988 .

[13]  M. Hixon,et al.  Weight gain and adjustment of feeding territory size in migrant hummingbirds. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  T. Garland,et al.  Individual Variation in Metabolism and Reproduction of Mus: Are Energetics and Life History Linked? , 1992 .

[15]  D. Hartl,et al.  A primer of population genetics , 1981 .

[16]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Estimation of Individual Fitness from Life-History Data , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[17]  M. Taper,et al.  Environmental Variation and the Persistence of Small Populations. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[18]  Brian Dennis,et al.  Estimation of Growth and Extinction Parameters for Endangered Species , 1991 .

[19]  F. Gill,et al.  Economics of Feeding Territoriality in the Golden-Winged Sunbird , 1975 .

[20]  M. Boyce Population Viability Analysis , 1992 .

[21]  R. Lande,et al.  A Quantitative Genetic Theory of Life History Evolution , 1982 .