Comparison of acoustic shock waves generated by micro and nanosecond lasers for a smart laser surgery system

Characterization of acoustic shock wave will guarantee efficient tissue differentiation as feedback to reduce the probability of undesirable damaging (i.e. cutting) of tissues in laser surgery applications. We ablated hard (bone) and soft (muscle) tissues using a nanosecond pulsed Nd:YAG laser at 532 nm and a microsecond pulsed Er:YAG laser at 2.94 μm. When the intense short ns-pulsed laser is applied to material, the energy gain causes locally a plasma at the ablated spot that expands and propagates as an acoustic shock wave with a rarefaction wave behind the shock front. However, when using a μs-pulsed Er:YAG laser for material ablation, the acoustic shock wave is generated during the explosion of the ablated material. We measured and compared the emitted acoustic shock wave generated by a ns-pulsed Nd:YAG laser and a μs-pulsed Er:YAG laser measured by a calibrated microphone. As the acoustic shock wave attenuates as it propagates through air, the distance between ablation spots and a calibrated microphone was at 5 cm. We present the measurements on the propagation characteristics of the laser generated acoustic shock wave by measuring the arrival time-of-flight with a calibrated microphone and the energy-dependent evolution of acoustic parameters such as peak-topeak pressure, the ratio of the peak-to-peak pressures for the laser induced breakdown in air, the ablated muscle and the bone, and the spectral energy.

[1]  T. Juhász,et al.  Dynamics of shock waves and cavitation bubbles generated by picosecond laser pulses in corneal tissue and water , 1994, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[2]  Michel Dard,et al.  A comparative investigation of bone surface after cutting with mechanical tools and Er:YAG laser , 2015, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[3]  Hyun Wook Kang,et al.  Enhancement of bovine bone ablation assisted by a transparent liquid Layer on a target surface , 2006, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[4]  G. Rauter,et al.  Effect of laser pulse duration on ablation efficiency of hard bone in microseconds regime , 2017, Applications of Optics and Photonics.

[5]  P. P. Kiran,et al.  Effect of pulse duration on the acoustic frequency emissions during the laser-induced breakdown of atmospheric air. , 2016, Applied optics.

[6]  Thierry Engel,et al.  Laser ablation acoustical monitoring , 1997 .

[7]  P. Cattin,et al.  Clinical applicability of robot-guided contact-free laser osteotomy in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery: in-vitro simulation and in-vivo surgery in minipig mandibles. , 2015, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  J. Diaci,et al.  A study of blast waveforms detected simultaneously by a microphone and a laser probe during laser ablation , 1992 .

[9]  S. Gross,et al.  Laser-induced optical breakdown applied for laser spark ignition , 2010 .

[10]  Michael Schmidt,et al.  Metal Ablation with Short and Ultrashort Laser Pulses , 2011 .

[11]  Francisco Montero de Espinosa,et al.  Noncontact monitoring of incision depth in laser surgery with air-coupled ultrasound transducers. , 2016, Optics letters.

[12]  Philippe C. Cattin,et al.  Characterization of ablated porcine bone and muscle using laser-induced acoustic wave method for tissue differentiation , 2017, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.