Automatic safety analysis of of computer-based railway signalling system

Ensuring safety in railway signalling system is always considered as significant as a guarantee of the safe and efficient operation of the whole railway. In fact, safety analysis of the signalling system with distributed computer technique is becoming extraordinarily difficult because of the frequent and complex interaction between components and the various backup modes. The dominant approaches are subjective, difficult to be reused, not well structured, thus leaving the safety analysis process time-consuming and error-prone. This paper develops a hierarchical methodology for safety analysis based on the failure propagation model and state-transition model. Unlike traditional safety analyses, the proposed approach demonstrates more accurate representation of practical failure behaviour in computer-based signalling system. Dynamic properties, system structure and failures in component level are separately modelled in different layers, and connected with synthesis laws. The analysis can be easily refined as the system design progresses and automatically produces safety-related information to help engineer in making design decisions. The preliminary design of Communication Based Train Control (CBTC) system for Yizhuang Line in Beijing is used to demonstrate the approach.

[1]  Faisal Khan,et al.  TOPHAZOP: a knowledge-based software tool for conducting HAZOP in a rapid, efficient yet inexpensive manner , 1997 .

[2]  Parosh Aziz Abdulla,et al.  Designing Safe, Reliable Systems Using Scade , 2004, ISoLA.

[3]  M. Bozzano,et al.  Integrating Fault Tree Analysis with Event Ordering Information ∗ , 2003 .

[4]  John A. McDermid,et al.  An integrated tool set for software safety analysis , 1993, J. Syst. Softw..

[5]  Peter Liggesmeyer,et al.  A New Component Concept for Fault Trees , 2003, SCS.

[6]  B. Kaiser,et al.  Extending the expressive power of fault trees , 2005, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2005. Proceedings..

[7]  J. A. McDermid,et al.  Towards integrated safety analysis and design , 1994, SIAP.

[8]  John A. McDermid,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of the behaviour of complex programmable electronic systems in conditions of failure , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Andreas Angerer,et al.  Modeling of self-adaptive systems with SCADE , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[10]  Venkat Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Digraph-based models for automated HAZOP analysis , 1995 .

[11]  Mansoor Alam,et al.  Quantitative Reliability Evaluation of Repairable Phased-Mission Systems Using Markov Approach , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[12]  Marco Bozzano,et al.  Improving Safety Assessment of Complex Systems: An Industrial Case Study , 2003, FME.

[13]  David Vernez,et al.  Method to assess and optimise dependability of complex macro-systems: Application to a railway signalling system , 2009 .

[14]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[15]  R. Bell,et al.  IEC 61508: functional safety of electrical/electronic/ programme electronic safety-related systems: overview , 1999 .

[16]  Marco Bozzano,et al.  Improving System Reliability via Model Checking: The FSAP/NuSMV-SA Safety Analysis Platform , 2003, SAFECOMP.