Utilization of matching score vector similarity measures in biometric systems

In biometric systems, people may be asked to provide multiple scans for redundancy and quality control. In the case of fingerprint matching systems, repeat fingerprint probes of the same physical finger can be available and data from such multiple samples can be fused for reliable authentication of individuals. Since multiple samples are from the same instance of the finger, some relationships between them, e.g. diversity or similarity, could be observed. In this paper, we investigate such relationships and use them in fusion in order to improve the performance of biometric systems. The relationships between samples are derived by measuring the similarity between matching score vectors with Pearson's correlation and cosine similarity measures. We conduct experiments using the FVC2002 dataset consisting of four fingerprint databases and trainable combination methods, likelihood ratio and multilayer perceptron. The results show that utilization of similarity measures for matching scores can further improve the multi-sample biometric fusion in both combination methods.

[1]  Venu Govindaraju,et al.  Combination of multiple samples utilizing identification model in biometric systems , 2011, 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB).

[2]  Arun Ross,et al.  Handbook of Multibiometrics (International Series on Biometrics) , 2006 .

[3]  Raymond N. J. Veldhuis,et al.  Multi-Sample Fusion with Template Protection , 2009, BIOSIG.

[4]  Sharath Pankanti,et al.  Error analysis of pattern recognition systems - the subsets bootstrap , 2004, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[5]  Arun Ross,et al.  Handbook of Multibiometrics , 2006, The Kluwer international series on biometrics.

[6]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Combining Classifiers , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Hakil Kim,et al.  Super-template Generation Using Successive Bayesian Estimation for Fingerprint Enrollment , 2005, AVBPA.

[8]  Aleix M. Martínez,et al.  A weighted probabilistic approach to face recognition from multiple images and video sequences , 2006, Image Vis. Comput..

[9]  Arun Ross,et al.  Biometric template selection and update: a case study in fingerprints , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  Arun Ross,et al.  Fingerprint mosaicking , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[11]  Gerhard Rigoll,et al.  A systematic comparison between on-line and off-line methods for signature verification with hidden Markov models , 1998, Proceedings. Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98EX170).

[12]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Video-based face recognition using probabilistic appearance manifolds , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[13]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Is independence good for combining classifiers? , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[14]  Arun Ross,et al.  An introduction to biometric recognition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[15]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Probabilistic recognition of human faces from video , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  Venu Govindaraju,et al.  A minutia-based partial fingerprint recognition system , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  Venu Govindaraju,et al.  Multiple-sample fusion of matching scores in biometric systems , 2011, CVPR 2011 WORKSHOPS.

[18]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Decision-Level Fusion in Fingerprint Verification , 2001, Multiple Classifier Systems.