A Mechanobiology-based Algorithm to Optimize the Microstructure Geometry of Bone Tissue Scaffolds

Complexity of scaffold geometries and biological mechanisms involved in the bone generation process make the design of scaffolds a quite challenging task. The most common approaches utilized in bone tissue engineering require costly protocols and time-consuming experiments. In this study we present an algorithm that, combining parametric finite element models of scaffolds with numerical optimization methods and a computational mechano-regulation model, is able to predict the optimal scaffold microstructure. The scaffold geometrical parameters are perturbed until the best geometry that allows the largest amounts of bone to be generated, is reached. We study the effects of the following factors: (1) the shape of the pores; (2) their spatial distribution; (3) the number of pores per unit area. The optimal dimensions of the pores have been determined for different values of scaffold Young's modulus and compression loading acting on the scaffold upper surface. Pores with rectangular section were predicted to lead to the formation of larger amounts of bone compared to square section pores; similarly, elliptic pores were predicted to allow the generation of greater amounts of bone compared to circular pores. The number of pores per unit area appears to have rather negligible effects on the bone regeneration process. Finally, the algorithm predicts that for increasing loads, increasing values of the scaffold Young's modulus are preferable. The results shown in the article represent a proof-of-principle demonstration of the possibility to optimize the scaffold microstructure geometry based on mechanobiological criteria.

[1]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[2]  M. V. D. van der Meulen,et al.  A mathematical framework to study the effects of growth factor influences on fracture healing. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  P. Bianco,et al.  Stem cells in tissue engineering , 2001, Nature.

[4]  P. Prendergast,et al.  A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Wei Sun,et al.  Recent development on computer aided tissue engineering - a review , 2002, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[6]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  A novel method for biomaterial scaffold internal architecture design to match bone elastic properties with desired porosity. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Wei Sun,et al.  Computer‐aided tissue engineering: overview, scope and challenges , 2004, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[8]  A. Nather Scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. , 2004, The Medical journal of Malaysia.

[9]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[10]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Bone ingrowth simulation for a concept glenoid component design. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Mechano-regulation of stem cell differentiation and tissue regeneration in osteochondral defects. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Corroboration of mechanoregulatory algorithms for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: comparison with in vivo results , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  Huanwen Ding,et al.  [Recent development of computer-aided tissue engineering]. , 2006, Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[15]  C. Pappalettere,et al.  The Influence of Expansion Rates on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: A Computational Analysis , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Patrick J. Prendergast,et al.  Tissue differentiation and bone regeneration in an osteotomized mandible: a computational analysis of the latency period , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[17]  Rüdiger Weiner,et al.  Angiogenesis in bone fracture healing: a bioregulatory model. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  Luciano Lamberti,et al.  EFFECTS OF AGING ON THE LATENCY PERIOD IN MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS: A COMPUTATIONAL MECHANOBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS , 2008 .

[19]  Peter Fratzl,et al.  The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Computational modelling of the mechanical environment of osteogenesis within a polylactic acid-calcium phosphate glass scaffold. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[21]  A. Olivares,et al.  Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[22]  Sara Checa,et al.  Corroboration of mechanobiological simulations of tissue differentiation in an in vivo bone chamber using a lattice‐modeling approach , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  Henrique de Amorim Almeida,et al.  Virtual topological optimisation of scaffolds for rapid prototyping. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  Damien Lacroix,et al.  Simulation of bone tissue formation within a porous scaffold under dynamic compression , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[25]  Sara Checa,et al.  Simulation of angiogenesis and cell differentiation in a CaP scaffold subjected to compressive strains using a lattice modeling approach. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[26]  Eugenio Guglielmelli,et al.  Load-Adaptive Scaffold Architecturing: A Bioinspired Approach to the Design of Porous Additively Manufactured Scaffolds with Optimized Mechanical Properties , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Carmine Pappalettere,et al.  A mechano‐regulation model of fracture repair in vertebral bodies , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  Hanna Isaksson,et al.  Recent advances in mechanobiological modeling of bone regeneration , 2012 .

[29]  Carmine Pappalettere,et al.  A model of tissue differentiation and bone remodelling in fractured vertebrae treated with minimally invasive percutaneous fixation , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[30]  Xiang Li,et al.  Influence of Architecture of β-Tricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds on Biological Performance in Repairing Segmental Bone Defects , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Philip Kollmannsberger,et al.  How Linear Tension Converts to Curvature: Geometric Control of Bone Tissue Growth , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  H Van Oosterwyck,et al.  The effect of pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[33]  Philip Kollmannsberger,et al.  Geometry as a Factor for Tissue Growth: Towards Shape Optimization of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[34]  C. Please,et al.  Pore Geometry Regulates Early Stage Human Bone Marrow Cell Tissue Formation and Organisation , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Cécile M. Bidan,et al.  Modelling the role of surface stress on the kinetics of tissue growth in confined geometries. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[36]  Cécile M. Bidan,et al.  A three-dimensional model for tissue deposition on complex surfaces , 2013, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[37]  S M Giannitelli,et al.  Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[38]  Jan Wieding,et al.  Numerical optimization of open-porous bone scaffold structures to match the elastic properties of human cortical bone. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[39]  W. J. Hendrikson,et al.  Modeling mechanical signals on the surface of µCT and CAD based rapid prototype scaffold models to predict (early stage) tissue development , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[40]  J. Jansen,et al.  Substrate geometry directs the in vitro mineralization of calcium phosphate ceramics. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[41]  S. M. Ahmadi,et al.  Mechanical analysis of a rodent segmental bone defect model: the effects of internal fixation and implant stiffness on load transfer. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  Colleen L Flanagan,et al.  Bioresorbable scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: optimal design, fabrication, mechanical testing and scale-size effects analysis. , 2015, Medical engineering & physics.

[43]  Amir A Zadpoor,et al.  Bone tissue regeneration: the role of scaffold geometry. , 2015, Biomaterials science.