A 360-Degree Model for Prioritizing Smart Cities Initiatives, with the Participation of Municipality Officials, Citizens and Experts

Smart cities can be considered a participatory arena for local governments and stakeholders, to co-create communities that can offer development opportunities and quality of life, no matter social group, age, or gender. It constitutes an environment for implementing innovative actions and hence a chance for contribution of many stakeholders. Several studies analyse the “smart city” as an ecosystem based on the triple helix model. In this model three actors are involved: the municipal administration, research organisations, and private sector enterprises (ventures mostly dealing with ICT—Information and Communication Technologies). Recently, research has suggested a central role of the local community as an innovation base, suggesting a Quadruple Helix Model where community works alongside with business, research and government in the new economy. The aim of this chapter is to collect information and propose suggestions regarding actions/projects in smart cities from all the stakeholders mentioned above, thus creating a “360-degree” model for prioritizing smart city interventions in any interested city. Moreover, it applies the developed prioritisation model in the Greek situation and finally, it reaches useful conclusions concerning citizen preferences and the degree of engagement in smart cities actions and projects.

[1]  Saraju P. Mohanty,et al.  Everything You Wanted to Know About Smart Cities , 2016, IEEE Consumer Electron. Mag..

[2]  Luis A. Hernández Gómez,et al.  Smart Cities at the Forefront of the Future Internet , 2011, Future Internet Assembly.

[3]  Renata Paola Dameri,et al.  Smart City Implementation , 2017 .

[4]  Maurizio Tomasella,et al.  Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things , 2010 .

[5]  Zelda Bronstein Industry and the smart city , 2009 .

[6]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[7]  Neil Sipe,et al.  Brisbane's digital strategy: an economic strategy for the digital age? , 2015 .

[8]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Triple Helix in the context of global change: dynamics and challenges , 2012 .

[9]  Panagiotis Tsarchopoulos,et al.  Smart Cities as Innovation Ecosystems sustained by the Future Internet , 2012 .

[10]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework , 2012, HICSS.

[11]  Oscar Afonso,et al.  A Growth Model for the Quadruple Helix Innovation Theory , 2010 .

[12]  Sujata Joshi,et al.  Developing Smart Cities: An Integrated Framework , 2016 .

[13]  Erman Coşkun,et al.  Analyzing digital divide within and between member and candidate countries o f European Union , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna,et al.  Conceptualizing, Modeling and Simulating Sustainability as Tools to Implement Urban Smartness , 2015, ICCSA.