Programs to compute magnetization to density ratio and the magnetization inclination from 3-D gravity and magnetic anomalies

Vector field formulation based on the Poisson theorem allows an automatic determination of rock physical properties (magnetization to density ratio-MDR-and the magnetization inclination-MI) from combined processing of gravity and magnetic geophysical data. The basic assumptions (i.e., Poisson conditions) are: that gravity and magnetic fields share common sources, and that these sources have a uniform magnetization direction and MDR. In addition, the previously existing formulation was restricted to profile data, and assumed sufficiently elongated (2-D) sources. For sources that violate Poisson conditions or have a 3-D geometry, the apparent values of MDR and MI that are generated in this way have an unclear relationship to the actual properties in the subsurface. We present Fortran programs that estimate MDR and MI values for 3-D sources through processing of gridded gravity and magnetic data. Tests with simple geophysical models indicate that magnetization polarity can be successfully recovered by MDR-MI processing, even in cases where juxtaposed bodies cannot be clearly distinguished on the basis of anomaly data. These results may be useful in crustal studies, especially in mapping magnetization polarity from marine-based gravity and magnetic data.

[1]  P. Taylor,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF MAGNETIZATION AND DENSITY OF A NORTH ATLANTIC SEAMOUNT USING POISSON’S THEOREM , 1971 .

[2]  S. Gupta,et al.  GRAVITATIONAL ATTRACTION OF A RECTANGULAR PARALLELEPIPED , 1977 .

[3]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77 , 1992 .

[4]  P. Gunn,et al.  LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS OF GRAVITY AND MAGNETIC FIELDS , 1975 .

[5]  R. Blakely Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications , 1996 .

[6]  V. Chandler,et al.  Moving-window Poisson analysis of gravity and magnetic data from the Penokean orogen, east-central Minnesota , 1991 .

[7]  C. Mendonça Automatic determination of the magnetization–density ratio and magnetization inclination from the joint interpretation of 2D gravity and magnetic anomalies , 2004 .

[8]  T. Hildenbrand 20. Magnetic Terranes in the Central United States Determined from the Interpretation of Digital Data , 1985 .

[9]  Donald Plouff,et al.  GRAVITY AND MAGNETIC FIELDS OF POLYGONAL PRISMS AND APPLICATION TO MAGNETIC TERRAIN CORRECTIONS , 1976 .

[10]  João B. C. Silva Reduction to the pole as an inverse problem and its application to low-latitude anomalies , 1986 .

[11]  C. Mendonça,et al.  A stable truncated series approximation of the reduction-to-the-pole operator , 1993 .

[12]  J. Koski,et al.  Analysis of multisource gravity and magnetic anomaly data sets by moving-window application of Poisson's Theorem , 1981 .

[13]  M. Bott,et al.  Matrix Methods for Joint Interpretation of Two-dimensional Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies with Application to the Iceland-Faeroe Ridge , 1972 .

[14]  V. Baranov A NEW METHOD FOR INTERPRETATION OF AEROMAGNETIC MAPS: PSEUDO‐GRAVIMETRIC ANOMALIES , 1957 .