A decision framework under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment with probability estimation for multi-criteria decision making

With growing hesitation in human perception, hesitant fuzzy set, an important extension of fuzzy set, has gained much attention from the research community. The concept of HFS gives decision makers the ability to provide multiple preferences for the same instance. However, the chance of these preferences occurring is assumed to be equal, which is unreasonable in practice. To circumvent this issue, probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set (PHFS) is adopted in this work, which is an extension of hesitant fuzzy set with associated probability values. Based on the literature review on PHFS, it is evident that (i) occurrence probability of each element was not methodically calculated; (ii) hesitation was not properly captured during criteria weight calculation; (iii) interrelationship among criteria was not captured during aggregation; and (iv) broad/rational ranking of alternatives with compromise solution was lacking. Motivated by these challenges and to alleviate the same, a systematic procedure is proposed in this paper to estimate these probabilities. Additionally, in this procedure, decision makers’ preferences are aggregated using the newly proposed probabilistic hesitant fuzzy generalized Maclaurin symmetric mean operator and criteria weights are calculated using the proposed statistical variance method in the context of PHFS. A new ranking method is also proposed that extends a well-known VIKOR method to the PHFS context. Further, the practical use of the proposed decision framework is demonstrated by two examples viz., selecting a suitable coordinator for a research and development project and selection of a doctoral candidate for the supervisor position. Finally, the strength and weakness of the proposed decision framework are realized by comparing it with state-of-the-art methods.

[1]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Sets: State of the Art and Future Directions , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[2]  Yingyu Wu,et al.  An Improved Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Method and Applications , 2016 .

[3]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy set and its application in multi-criteria decision making , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[4]  Lin Li,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic linguistic Maclaurin symmetric mean operators , 2016, Neural Computing and Applications.

[5]  Qinggong Ma,et al.  Multi-attribute group decision making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment with application to evaluate the transformation efficiency , 2018, Applied Intelligence.

[6]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Belief structures, weight generating functions and decision-making , 2017, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[8]  Mingwei Lin,et al.  Decision making with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information based on multiplicative consistency , 2020, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[9]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making , 2013, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.

[10]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operators and Its Application to Multiple-Attribute Decision Making , 2015, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[11]  Muhammad Sajjad Ali Khan,et al.  Applications of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy rough set in decision support system , 2020, Soft Computing.

[12]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. By C. Spearman, 1904. , 1987, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  Ashkan Hafezalkotob,et al.  Fuzzy entropy-weighted MULTIMOORA method for materials selection , 2016, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[14]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Weight determination for consistently ranking alternatives in multiple criteria decision analysis , 2010 .

[15]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[16]  Yuming Chu,et al.  Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Soft Rough Sets for the Selection of Sustainable Material Handling Equipment , 2020, Symmetry.

[17]  Qingguo Li,et al.  Hesitant Triangular Fuzzy Information Aggregation Operators Based on Bonferroni Means and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[18]  Min Sun,et al.  The Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Weighted Average Operators and Their Application in Strategic Decision Making , 2013 .

[19]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[20]  Sen Liu,et al.  Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: An improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Harish Garg,et al.  Quantifying gesture information in brain hemorrhage patients using probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets with unknown probability information , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  T. Saaty Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process , 2008 .

[23]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[24]  Tabasam Rashid,et al.  Multicriteria Group Decision Making by Using Trapezoidal Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Sets , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[25]  Muhammad Riaz,et al.  A robust extension of VIKOR method for bipolar fuzzy sets using connection numbers of SPA theory based metric spaces , 2020, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[26]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets , 2012, J. Appl. Math..

[27]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Application in Group Decision-Making , 2013, J. Appl. Math..

[28]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Probability Calculation and Element Optimization of Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on Expected Consistency , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[29]  Jian Li,et al.  A consensus-based approach for multi-criteria decision making with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information , 2020, Soft Comput..

[30]  T S ChanFelix,et al.  Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor , 2016 .

[31]  Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior,et al.  A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[32]  Jianping Ou,et al.  On Arc Connectivity of Direct-Product Digraphs , 2012, J. Appl. Math..

[33]  Jian Li,et al.  Multi-attribute decision making based on prioritized operators under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environments , 2018, Soft Computing.

[34]  Jian Li,et al.  Multi-criteria decision-making with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information based on expected multiplicative consistency , 2018, Neural Computing and Applications.

[35]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy set and its application in risk evaluation , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[36]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment , 2016, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.

[37]  T. Saaty,et al.  Why the magic number seven plus or minus two , 2003 .

[38]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Advances in Matrices, Finite and Infinite, with Applications , 2013, J. Appl. Math..

[39]  Guoyin Wang,et al.  Erratum to “Experimental Analyses of the Major Parameters Affecting the Intensity of Outbursts of Coal and Gas” , 2014, The Scientific World Journal.

[40]  Yuming Chu,et al.  q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Geometric Aggregation Operators Based on Generalized and Group-Generalized Parameters with Application to Water Loss Management , 2020, Symmetry.

[41]  Masooma Raza Hashmi,et al.  Linear Diophantine fuzzy set and its applications towards multi-attribute decision-making problems , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[42]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Consistency of the fused intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation in group intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[43]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Priorities of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relation Based on Multiplicative Consistency , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[44]  Gagandeep Kaur,et al.  A robust correlation coefficient for probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its applications , 2019, Neural Computing and Applications.

[45]  Xindong Peng,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy soft MCGDM methods based on TOPSIS, VIKOR and aggregation operators , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..