Using visual representation of conepts to explore users and designers' concepts of everyday products

Enhancing the design of user–product interactions prompted the emergence of research that supports designers' engagement with users' experience as an essential component of the design process. One such study focusses on investigating the influence of human experience on users' and designers' differing concepts of products. The paper introduces this study's methodological approach, which employs visual representations of concepts to uncover the experiential and contextual component of people's understanding of product use. Findings are presented in the form of design principles that aim to assist the design of product usability by informing designers about the specific aspects of human experience that trigger people's understanding of products and product usage.

[1]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  Designing probes for empathy with families , 2004 .

[2]  G. Goldschmidt The dialectics of sketching , 1991 .

[3]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[4]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  Postdesign and Participatory Culture , 1999 .

[5]  Clive Rassam Design and corporate success , 1995 .

[6]  C. Jewitt,et al.  The Handbook of Visual Analysis , 2000 .

[7]  Marianella Chamorro-Koc,et al.  Visual Representation of Concepts: Exploring Users' and Designers' Concepts of Everyday Products , 2005 .

[8]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  Virtuosos of the Experience Domain , 2001 .

[9]  P. Jordan,et al.  Pleasure With Products : Beyond Usability , 2002 .

[10]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement , 2002 .

[11]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[12]  G. Gaskell,et al.  Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound , 2000 .

[13]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions , 1998 .

[14]  Paul Rodgers,et al.  Visible ideas:Information patterns of conceptual sketch activity , 1998 .

[15]  Victor Margolin,et al.  The idea of design , 1995 .

[16]  V. Goel Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[17]  Rune Pettersson Visuals for information : research and practice , 1989 .

[18]  N. Anderson,et al.  Expanding the boundaries of health and social science : case studies in interdisciplinary innovation , 2003 .

[19]  Kee Yong Lim,et al.  Proceedings of the joint conference of APCHI 2000 (4th Asia Pacific Conference on Human Computer Interaction), ASEAN Ergonomics 2000 (6th S.E. asian Ergonomics Society Conference) : 27th November to 1st December, Singapore , 2000 .

[20]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Contextmapping: experiences from practice , 2005 .

[21]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  Video, Film and Photographs as Research Documents , 2000 .

[22]  Christopher Lorenz,et al.  The Design Dimension: The New Competitive Weapon for Product Strategy and Global Marketing , 1987 .

[23]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[24]  Eugene S. Ferguson,et al.  Engineering and the Mind's Eye , 1994 .

[25]  D. Levitin The foundations of cognitive psychology: Core readings , 2005, History & Philosophy of Psychology.

[26]  Patrick W. Jordan,et al.  An Introduction to Usability , 1998 .

[27]  Marianella Chamorro-Koc,et al.  Experience, context-of-use and the design of product usability , 2007 .

[28]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Co-designing methods for designing with and for families , 2003 .

[29]  D. Steiner,et al.  Working Anywhere: Co-design Through Participation , 2000 .

[30]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  The thinking eye: visual re-cognition in design emergence , 2002 .

[31]  Jorge Frascara,et al.  Design and the Social Sciences : Making Connections , 2002 .

[32]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[33]  Lilian Henze,et al.  CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO Mapping the User-Product Relationship (in Product Design) , 2002 .

[34]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[35]  J. Hughes,et al.  Designing with Care: Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in Sensitive Settings , 2003 .

[36]  Johan Redström,et al.  Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design , 2006 .

[37]  Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders,et al.  From user-centered to participatory design approaches , 2002 .

[38]  Donald A. Schön The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[39]  Michael Tovey,et al.  Drawing and CAD in industrial design , 1989 .

[40]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Design Research: Methods and Perspectives , 2003 .

[41]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  The importance of visualisation in concept design , 2001 .