Mitigating the Impact of Field and Image Registration Errors through Spatial Aggregation

Remotely sensed data are commonly used as predictor variables in spatially explicit models depicting landscape characteristics of interest (response) across broad extents, at relatively fine resolution. To create these models, variables are spatially registered to a known coordinate system and used to link responses with predictor variable values. Inherently, this linking process introduces measurement error into the response and predictors, which in the latter case causes attenuation bias. Through simulations, our findings indicate that the spatial correlation of response and predictor variables and their corresponding spatial registration (co-registration) errors can have a substantial impact on the bias and accuracy of linear models. Additionally, in this study we evaluate spatial aggregation as a mechanism to minimize the impact of co-registration errors, assess the impact of subsampling within the extent of sample units, and provide a technique that can be used to both determine the extent of an observational unit needed to minimize the impact of co-registration and quantify the amount of error potentially introduced into predictive models.

[1]  John Hogland,et al.  Mapping Forest Characteristics at Fine Resolution across Large Landscapes of the Southeastern United States Using NAIP Imagery and FIA Field Plot Data , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[2]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape Ecology Explained@@@Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process , 2001 .

[3]  John Hogland,et al.  Function Modeling Improves the Efficiency of Spatial Modeling Using Big Data from Remote Sensing , 2017, Big Data Cogn. Comput..

[4]  James M. Omernik,et al.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States: Evolution of a Hierarchical Spatial Framework , 2014, Environmental Management.

[5]  John Hogland,et al.  New Geospatial Approaches for Efficiently Mapping Forest Biomass Logistics at High Resolution over Large Areas , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[6]  Anthony Paul Doulgeris,et al.  Unsupervised change detection of multitemporal Landsat imagery to identify changes in land cover following the Chernobyl accident , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[7]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. , 1994 .

[8]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[9]  Edzer J. Pebesma,et al.  Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package , 2004, Comput. Geosci..

[10]  F. Gao,et al.  Generating daily land surface temperature at Landsat resolution by fusing Landsat and MODIS data , 2014 .

[11]  Edzer Pebesma,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Interpolation using gstat , 2016, R J..

[12]  Tim R. McVicar,et al.  The impact of misregistration on SRTM and DEM image differences , 2008 .

[13]  J. R. Jensen Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective , 2000 .

[14]  A. Chesher The effect of measurement error , 1991 .

[15]  S. Escuin,et al.  Fire severity assessment by using NBR (Normalized Burn Ratio) and NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) derived from LANDSAT TM/ETM images , 2008 .

[16]  K. O. Niemann,et al.  Simulated impact of sample plot size and co-registration error on the accuracy and uncertainty of LiDAR-derived estimates of forest stand biomass , 2011 .

[17]  Philip H. Warren,et al.  Identifying multispecies connectivity corridors and the spatial pattern of the landscape , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[18]  Alexander Kukush,et al.  Measurement Error Models , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[19]  C. L. Shafer,et al.  Land use planning: A potential force for retaining habitat connectivity in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and Beyond , 2015 .

[20]  Feng R. Zhao,et al.  Mapping pine plantations in the southeastern U.S. using structural, spectral, and temporal remote sensing data , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[21]  John Hogland,et al.  Fine Resolution Probabilistic Land Cover Classification of Landscapes in the Southeastern United States , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[22]  D. Turner,et al.  The role of remote sensing in process-scaling studies of managed forest ecosystems , 2015 .

[23]  A. Zeileis,et al.  Beta Regression in R , 2010 .

[24]  Sarah J. Graves,et al.  A tree-based approach to biomass estimation from remote sensing data in a tropical agricultural landscape , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[25]  Demetrios Gatziolis,et al.  Modeling Forest Aboveground Biomass and Volume Using Airborne LiDAR Metrics and Forest Inventory and Analysis Data in the Pacific Northwest , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[26]  J. Irons,et al.  Landsat 8: The plans, the reality, and the legacy , 2016 .

[27]  Hui Lin,et al.  Impacts of Plot Location Errors on Accuracy of Mapping and Scaling Up Aboveground Forest Carbon Using Sample Plot and Landsat TM Data , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[28]  G. Meera Gandhi,et al.  Ndvi: Vegetation Change Detection Using Remote Sensing and Gis – A Case Study of Vellore District☆ , 2015 .

[29]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[30]  M. Niță,et al.  Forestland connectivity in Romania—Implications for policy and management , 2018, Land Use Policy.

[31]  Matthias Pietsch Contribution of connectivity metrics to the assessment of biodiversity – Some methodological considerations to improve landscape planning , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[32]  Paul L. Patterson,et al.  Effects of registration errors between remotely sensed and ground data on estimators of forest area , 2003 .

[33]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Shadow allometry: Estimating tree structural parameters using hyperspatial image analysis , 2005 .

[34]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[35]  Alex M. Lechner,et al.  From static connectivity modelling to scenario-based planning at local and regional scales , 2015 .

[36]  Suming Jin,et al.  Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States – Representing a Decade of Land Cover Change Information , 2015 .

[37]  E. Næsset,et al.  Assessing effects of positioning errors and sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data. , 2009 .

[38]  P. Moran Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[39]  S. Thompson,et al.  Correcting for regression dilution bias: comparison of methods for a single predictor variable , 2000 .

[40]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Effects of positional errors in model-assisted and model-based estimation of growing stock volume , 2016 .