The physiology of memory: recordings of things past.

neural development: the recruitment of cellular programs of growth by signaling molecules. These cellular programs can include alterations in the display of cell surface adhesion molecules. For example, long-term sensitization training in Aplysia causes a transcription-dependent down-regulation of NCAM-related cell adhesion molecules on the surface of sensory neurons (18). If this were generally the case, then in a sense, Sperry's circle is squared. Activity initiated by experience could lead to the release of signaling molecules that engage transcriptional control mechanisms, which modulate cell surface receptors so as to regulate cell-cell interactions. The development of stem cell techniques for homologous recombination in mice (19) has provided a useful tool for testing genetically whether a particular mechanism is important for LTP in the hippocampus of the adult organism and whether LTP in the hippocampus is causally required for learning (20). These gene ablation methods can now be extended to determine whether synaptic modulation during development resembles memory storage only phenotypically or whether they actually share common molecular mechanisms (20). We should therefore soon be in a position to see whether solutions to the problems of learning and memory will yield, as an extra bonus, insights into synapse development and vice versa. If the study of learning and synapse development prove to be mutually reinforcing on the molecular level, then the Decade of the Brain, which we hope will relate molecules to mind, will be off to a particularly good start. Our conception of the process of memory how we remember and recognize-is now undergoing a revolution similar to the dramatic changes seen over the past two decades in our understanding of how sensory information is processed. Sensory systems are now known to comprise a large number of separate cortical areas with complex in-terconnections; this complexity replaces the old notion of a primary sensory area with one or two cortical subsidiary areas. Likewise, memory is being fractionated as a result of recent studies-psychological, physiological, and anatomical (1). This fractionation of memory systems was inevitable, as it now appears that most or all of the adult brain undergoes learning-dependent changes. Each biological change contributes to one or more of the numerous memory systems, which are defined behav-iorally or psychologically. One class of memory system underlies declarative, or explicit, memories, which are the memories of specific facts and events. Within this class, it is useful to distinguish short-term (working memory) processes from long-term ones, and …

[1]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Adaptive mechanisms in cortical networks underlying cortical contributions to learning and nondeclarative memory. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[2]  Richard F. Thompson Are memory traces localized or distributed? , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  I. Riches,et al.  The effects of visual stimulation and memory on neurons of the hippocampal formation and the neighboring parahippocampal gyrus and inferior temporal cortex of the primate , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  W. J. Nowack Neurobiology of Neocortex , 1989, Neurology.

[5]  L. Squire,et al.  The medial temporal lobe memory system , 1991, Science.

[6]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The hippocampus--what does it do? , 1992, Behavioral and neural biology.

[7]  M Mishkin,et al.  Amygdalectomy impairs crossmodal association in monkeys. , 1985, Science.

[8]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Classical conditioning induces CS-specific receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig , 1990, Brain Research.

[9]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Neocortical memory circuits. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[10]  E. Murray,et al.  Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) with rhinal cortex ablations succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hr intertrial intervals and fail at matching to sample despite double sample presentations. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[12]  Y. Miyashita Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex , 1988, Nature.

[13]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Extraretinal representations in area V4 in the macaque monkey , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Massive cortical reorganization after sensory deafferentation in adult macaques. , 1991, Science.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional anatomy of human procedural learning determined with regional cerebral blood flow and PET , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates , 1991, Nature.

[17]  S. Wise,et al.  Learning-dependent neuronal activity in the premotor cortex: activity during the acquisition of conditional motor associations , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Gross,et al.  Auditory association cortex lesions impair auditory short-term memory in monkeys. , 1990, Science.

[19]  R. Desimone,et al.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. , 1991, Science.

[20]  J. Fuster,et al.  Inferotemporal neurons distinguish and retain behaviorally relevant features of visual stimuli. , 1981, Science.

[21]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neuronal correlate of pictorial short-term memory in the primate temporal cortexYasushi Miyashita , 1988, Nature.

[22]  F M Miezin,et al.  Activation of the hippocampus in normal humans: a functional anatomical study of memory. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.