Appropriation, Additive Approaches and Accidents: The Sampler as Compositional Tool and Recording Dislocation doi:10.5429/2079-3871(2010)v1i2.3en

Brian Eno describes the recording studio as a compositional tool that has enabled composers to enjoy a more direct relationship with sound. This article will explore the use of the digital sampler as one of the studio tools that forms part of this creative process and focuses on interviews with a group of Edinburgh musicians called Found who successfully combine the writing of pop songs with the sampling of found sounds. The core song-writing partnership share an art school background and I was keen to discover if they use the sampler and other tools to sculpt sound in a similar way to how they paint. Much of the academic literature on digital sampling within popular music studies has been skewed towards its disruptive consequences for copyright law and, while legal and moral questions are still relevant, I am keen to concentrate on the processes of music making and the aesthetic choices made by composers and producers in the studio. Recent ethnographic work by Joseph Schloss has centred on these questions in relation to hip-hop and it is important to examine and understand how the sampler continues to be used by musicians and producers in a variety of genres.

[1]  Joanna Teresa Demers,et al.  Steal This Music: How Intellectual Property Law Affects Musical Creativity , 2006 .

[2]  Albin J. Zak The Poetics of Rock: Cutting Tracks, Making Records , 2001 .

[3]  Tara Rodgers,et al.  On the process and aesthetics of sampling in electronic music production , 2003, Organised Sound.

[4]  Eliot Bates Glitches, Bugs, and Hisses:: The Degeneration of Musical Recordings and the Contemporary Musical Work , 2004 .

[5]  Sarah Thornton Club Cultures: Music, Media, and Subcultural Capital , 1995 .

[6]  Simon Frith,et al.  Analysing live music in the UK: findings one year into a three-year research project , 2010 .

[7]  S. Frith,et al.  Art Into Pop , 1987 .

[8]  Simon Frith,et al.  The popular music industry , 2001 .

[9]  George M. Martin,et al.  All You Need Is Ears , 1979 .

[10]  Simon Reynolds,et al.  Energy Flash: a Journey Through Rave Music and Dance Culture , 1998 .

[11]  Paul Théberge,et al.  Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology , 1998 .

[12]  Patrick Runkle,et al.  The mellotron book , 2002 .

[13]  John Williamson,et al.  Rethinking the music industry , 2007, Popular Music.

[14]  Serge Lacasse Intertextuality and Hypertextuality in Recorded Popular Music , 2000 .

[15]  David Sanjek,et al.  Will Pop Eat Itself? Pop Music in the Soundbite Era , 1995 .

[16]  J. Auner Making Old Machines Speak: Images of Technology in Recent Music* , 2000 .

[17]  Nick Prior,et al.  OK COMPUTER: Mobility, software and the laptop musician , 2008 .

[18]  Jason Mittell,et al.  The Aesthetics of Failure , 2009 .

[19]  Nick Prior,et al.  “The Rise of the New Amateurs: Popular Music, Digital Technology and the Fate of Cultural Production” , 2010 .

[20]  M. Butler,et al.  Unlocking the Groove: Rhythm, Meter, and Musical Design in Electronic Dance Music , 2006 .

[21]  Kim Cascone,et al.  The Aesthetics of Failure: Post-Digital Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music , 2000, Computer Music Journal.

[22]  Thomas G. Schumacher `This is a sampling sport':1 digital sampling, rap music and the law in cultural production , 1995 .

[23]  Eric Tamm,et al.  Brian Eno: His Music And The Vertical Color Of Sound , 1989 .

[24]  S. Frith Is jazz popular music , 2007 .

[25]  David Toop,et al.  Ocean of Sound: Aether Talk, Ambient Sound and Imaginary Worlds , 2000 .

[26]  J. Stock RECONSIDERING THE PAST: ZHOU XUAN AND THE REHABILITATION OF EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY POPULAR MUSIC , 1995 .

[27]  Guy Osborn,et al.  Copyright law and power in the music industry , 2004 .

[28]  Torben Sangild Glitch—The Beauty of Malfunction , 2004 .

[29]  Tricia Rose Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in Contemporary America , 1995 .