Distributions of Beneficial Fitness Effects in RNA

Beneficial mutations are the driving force of evolution by natural selection. Yet, relatively little is known about the distribution of the fitness effects of beneficial mutations in populations. Recent work of Gillespie and Orr suggested some of the first generalizations for the distributions of beneficial fitness effects and, surprisingly, they depend only weakly on biological details. In particular, the theory suggests that beneficial mutations obey an exponential distribution of fitness effects, with the same exponential parameter across different regions of genotype space, provided only that few possible beneficial mutations are available to that genotype. Here we tested this hypothesis with a quasi-empirical model of RNA evolution in which fitness is based on the secondary structures of molecules and their thermodynamic stabilities. The fitnesses of randomly selected genotypes appeared to follow a Gumbel-type distribution and thus conform to a basic assumption of adaptation theory. However, the observed distributions of beneficial fitness effects conflict with specific predictions of the theory. In particular, the distributions of beneficial fitness effects appeared exponential only when the vast majority of small-effect beneficial mutations were ignored. Additionally, the distribution of beneficial fitness effects varied with the fitness of the parent genotype. We believe that correlation of the fitness values among similar genotypes is likely the cause of the departure from the predictions of recent adaptation theory. Although in conflict with the current theory, these results suggest that more complex statistical generalizations about beneficial mutations may be possible.

[1]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[2]  E. J. Gumbel,et al.  Statistics of Extremes. , 1960 .

[3]  M. Waterman Secondary Structure of Single-Stranded Nucleic Acidst , 1978 .

[4]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Fast algorithm for predicting the secondary structure of single-stranded RNA. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Michael Zuker,et al.  Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information , 1981, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  J. Gillespie A simple stochastic gene substitution model. , 1983, Theoretical population biology.

[7]  M. R. Leadbetter,et al.  Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes: Springer Series in Statistics , 1983 .

[8]  M. Zuker On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA molecule. , 1989, Science.

[9]  J. McCaskill The equilibrium partition function and base pair binding probabilities for RNA secondary structure , 1990, Biopolymers.

[10]  Weinberger,et al.  RNA folding and combinatory landscapes. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[11]  Walter Fontana,et al.  Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures , 1994 .

[12]  P. Schuster,et al.  From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  A. Ellington,et al.  RNA Selection: Aptamers achieve the desired recognition , 1994, Current Biology.

[14]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  H. A. Orr,et al.  THE POPULATION GENETICS OF ADAPTATION: THE DISTRIBUTION OF FACTORS FIXED DURING ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  P. Schuster,et al.  IR-98-039 / April Continuity in Evolution : On the Nature of Transitions , 1998 .

[17]  M. Huynen,et al.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  P. Schuster,et al.  Complete suboptimal folding of RNA and the stability of secondary structures. , 1999, Biopolymers.

[19]  L. Chao,et al.  Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus phi6. , 1999, Genetics.

[20]  W. Fontana,et al.  Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in RNA. , 2000, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[21]  J. Parsch,et al.  Comparative sequence analysis and patterns of covariation in RNA secondary structures. , 2000, Genetics.

[22]  J. Doudna Structural genomics of RNA , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[23]  W. Atchley,et al.  Correlations among amino acid sites in bHLH protein domains: an information theoretic analysis. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  M Imhof,et al.  Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  C. Wilke,et al.  Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  P. Gerrish,et al.  Fitness Effects of Fixed Beneficial Mutations in Microbial Populations , 2002, Current Biology.

[27]  H. A. Orr,et al.  THE POPULATION GENETICS OF ADAPTATION: THE ADAPTATION OF DNA SEQUENCES , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations. , 2003, Genetics.

[29]  Rafael Sanjuán,et al.  The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Andrew D. Ellington,et al.  The Robustness of Naturally and Artificially Selected Nucleic Acid Secondary Structures , 2004, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[31]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.