European Gravity Service for Improved Emergency Management (EGSIEM)—from concept to implementation

Earth observation satellites yield a wealth of data for scientific, operational and commercial exploitation. However, the redistribution of mass in the system Earth is not yet part of the standard inventory of Earth Observation (EO) data products to date. It is derived from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission and its Follow-On mission (GRACE-FO). Among many other applications, mass redistribution provides fundamental insights into the global water cycle. Changes in continental water storage impact the regional water budget and can, in extreme cases, result in floods and droughts that often claim a high toll on infrastructure, economy and human lives. The initiative for a European Gravity Service for Improved Emergency Management (EGSIEM) established three different prototype services to promote the unique value of mass redistribution products for Earth Observation in general and for early-warning systems in particular. The first prototype service is a scientific combination service to derive improved mass redistribution products from the combined knowledge of the European GRACE analysis centres. Secondly, the timeliness and reliability of such products is a primary concern for any early-warning system and therefore EGSIEM established a prototype for a near real-time service that provides dedicated gravity field information with a maximum latency of five days . Third, EGSIEM established a prototype of a hydrological / early warning service that derives wetness indices as indicators of hydrological extremes and assessed their potential for timely scheduling of high-resolution optical/radar satellites for follow-up observations in case of evolving hydrological extreme events.

[1]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  What Can be Expected from the GRACE-FO Laser Ranging Interferometer for Earth Science Applications? , 2016, Surveys in Geophysics.

[2]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  A GRACE‐based water storage deficit approach for hydrological drought characterization , 2014 .

[3]  Stefan Voigt,et al.  Satellite Image Analysis for Disaster and Crisis-Management Support , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Vincent Humphrey,et al.  Assessing Global Water Storage Variability from GRACE: Trends, Seasonal Cycle, Subseasonal Anomalies and Extremes , 2016, Surveys in Geophysics.

[5]  Robert E. Wolfe,et al.  Key characteristics of MODIS data products , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Jürgen Kusche,et al.  The updated ESA Earth System Model for future gravity mission simulation studies , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[7]  A. Eicker,et al.  ITG-GRACE: Global Static and Temporal Gravity Field Models from GRACE Data , 2010 .

[8]  Beate Klinger,et al.  ITSG-Grace2016 - Monthly and Daily Gravity Field Solutions from GRACE , 2016 .

[9]  R. Dach,et al.  Time variable Earth’s gravity field from SLR satellites , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[10]  Christian Gruber,et al.  Short-latency monitoring of continental, ocean- and atmospheric mass variations using GRACE intersatellite accelerations , 2019, Geophysical Journal International.

[11]  Radford M. Neal,et al.  A data-calibrated distribution of deglacial chronologies for the North American ice complex from glaciological modeling , 2012 .

[12]  J. Wahr,et al.  A comparison of annual vertical crustal displacements from GPS and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) over Europe , 2007 .

[13]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Sea level and global ice volumes from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Simon Plank,et al.  Sentinel-1-based flood mapping: a fully automated processing chain , 2016 .

[15]  Pedro Elosegui,et al.  Climate‐driven deformation of the solid Earth from GRACE and GPS , 2004 .

[16]  Lev Tarasov,et al.  Reappraisal of the Ångerman River decay time estimate and its application to determine uncertainty in Earth viscosity structure , 2015 .

[17]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[18]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  Improved daily GRACE gravity field solutions using a Kalman smoother , 2012 .

[19]  Scott B. Luthcke,et al.  Simulation study of a follow-on gravity mission to GRACE , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[20]  Beate Klinger,et al.  The role of accelerometer data calibration within GRACE gravity field recovery: Results from ITSG-Grace2016 , 2016 .

[21]  J. Kučera,et al.  Global trends in satellite-based emergency mapping , 2016, Science.

[22]  S. Bettadpur,et al.  Ensemble prediction and intercomparison analysis of GRACE time‐variable gravity field models , 2014 .

[23]  M. Meindl,et al.  GNSS processing at CODE: status report , 2009 .

[24]  A. Jäggi,et al.  Combination of GRACE monthly gravity field solutions from different processing strategies , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[25]  Arturo Villiger,et al.  CODE rapid product series for the IGS , 2016 .

[26]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Vertical deformations from homogeneously processed GRACE and global GPS long-term series , 2011 .

[27]  Mike P. Stewart,et al.  GPS height time series: Short‐period origins of spurious long‐period signals , 2007 .

[28]  A. Jäggi,et al.  AIUB-RL02: an improved time-series of monthly gravity fields from GRACE data , 2016 .

[29]  Qiang Chen,et al.  Validation of the EGSIEM GRACE Gravity Fields Using GNSS Coordinate Timeseries and In-Situ Ocean Bottom Pressure Records , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[30]  N. G. Val’es,et al.  CNES/GRGS 10-day gravity field models (release 2) and their evaluation , 2010 .

[31]  H. Bock,et al.  The impact of common versus separate estimation of orbit parameters on GRACE gravity field solutions , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[32]  W. van der Wal,et al.  GRACE gravity observations constrain Weichselian ice thickness in the Barents Sea , 2015 .

[33]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2008: an improved solution of the international terrestrial reference frame , 2011 .

[34]  J. Ray,et al.  The IGS contribution to ITRF2014 , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[35]  David E. Smith,et al.  The Development of the NASA GSFC and NIMA Joint Geopotential Model , 1997 .

[36]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Continental and global scale flood forecasting systems , 2016 .

[37]  Jeongrae Kim,et al.  Simulation study of a low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking mission , 2000 .

[38]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Status of the GRACE Follow-On Mission , 2013 .

[39]  R. Dach,et al.  CODE’s new solar radiation pressure model for GNSS orbit determination , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[40]  P. Döll,et al.  A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation , 2003 .

[41]  Philippe Huybrechts,et al.  A model of Greenland ice sheet deglaciation constrained by observations of relative sea level and ice extent , 2014 .

[42]  D. Chambers,et al.  GRACE, time-varying gravity, Earth system dynamics and climate change , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[43]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2014: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame modeling nonlinear station motions , 2016 .

[44]  Grzegorz Michalak,et al.  GFZ RL05: An Improved Time-Series of Monthly GRACE Gravity Field Solutions , 2014 .

[45]  Chris Rizos,et al.  The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems , 2009 .

[46]  J. Kusche,et al.  Decorrelated GRACE time-variable gravity solutions by GFZ, and their validation using a hydrological model , 2009 .

[47]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Global terrestrial water storage capacity and flood potential using GRACE , 2009 .

[48]  Animesh K. Gain,et al.  Daily GRACE gravity field solutions track major flood events in the Ganges–Brahmaputra Delta , 2017 .

[49]  Sandro Martinis,et al.  A fully automated TerraSAR-X based flood service , 2015 .

[50]  Annette Eicker,et al.  Science and User Needs for Observing Global Mass Transport to Understand Global Change and to Benefit Society , 2015, Surveys in Geophysics.

[51]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[52]  Brian F. Thomas,et al.  River basin flood potential inferred using GRACE gravity observations at several months lead time , 2014 .

[53]  Jean-Charles Marty,et al.  EIGEN-6C: A High-Resolution Global Gravity Combination Model Including GOCE Data , 2014 .

[54]  Angelyn W. Moore,et al.  The Antarctica component of postglacial rebound model ICE-6G_C (VM5a) based on GPS positioning, exposure age dating of ice thicknesses, and relative sea level histories , 2014 .

[55]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  High precision dynamic orbit integration for spaceborne gravimetry in view of GRACE Follow-on , 2016 .

[56]  R. Haagmans,et al.  The GOCE gravity mission: ESA's first core explorer , 2007 .

[57]  Stefan Dech,et al.  The International Charter ‘Space and Major Disasters’: DLR’s Contributions to Emergency Response Worldwide , 2017, PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science.

[58]  Leos Mervart,et al.  The celestial mechanics approach: application to data of the GRACE mission , 2010 .

[59]  H. Bock,et al.  High-rate GPS clock corrections from CODE: support of 1 Hz applications , 2009 .

[60]  Byron D. Tapley,et al.  Determination of long-term changes in the Earth's gravity field from satellite laser ranging observations , 1997 .

[61]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Homogeneous reprocessing of GPS, GLONASS and SLR observations , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[62]  Stefano Cesare,et al.  Next Generation Gravity Mission , 2013 .

[63]  J. Mangerud,et al.  The last Eurasian ice sheets – a chronological database and time‐slice reconstruction, DATED‐1 , 2016 .

[64]  Vincenza Luceri,et al.  Estimation of low degree geopotential coefficients using SLR data , 1998 .

[65]  Frank Flechtner,et al.  Contributions of GRACE to understanding climate change , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[66]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Reprocessing of a global GPS network , 2006 .

[67]  Beate Klinger,et al.  Combination of GRACE star camera and angular acceleration data: impact on monthly gravity field models , 2014 .

[68]  R. König,et al.  A new high-resolution model of non-tidal atmosphere and ocean mass variability for de-aliasing of satellite gravity observations: AOD1B RL06 , 2017 .

[69]  Grzegorz Michalak,et al.  GFZ GRACE Level-2 Processing Standards Document for Level-2 Product Release 0005 : revised edition, January 2013 , 2013 .

[70]  David Pollard,et al.  A data-constrained large ensemble analysis of Antarctic evolution since the Eemian , 2014 .