Ipsilateral Motor Responses to Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects and Acute-Stroke Patients

Background and Purpose— Prevalence and characteristics of ipsilateral upper limb motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were compared in healthy subjects and patients with acute stroke. Methods— Sixteen healthy subjects and 25 patients with acute stroke underwent focal TMS at maximum stimulator output over motor and premotor cortices. If present, MEPs evoked in muscles ipsilateral to TMS were analyzed for latency, amplitude, shape, and center of gravity (ie, preferential coil location to elicit them). In stroke patients, possible relationships between early ipsilateral responses and functional outcome at 6 months were sought. Results— With relaxed or slightly contracting target muscle, maximal TMS over the motor cortex failed to elicit ipsilateral MEPs in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) or biceps of any of 16 normal subjects. In 5 of 8 healthy subjects tested, ipsilateral MEPs with latencies longer than contralateral MEPs were evoked in FDI muscle (in biceps, 6 of 8 subjects) during strong (>50% maximum) contraction of the target muscle. In 15 of 25 stroke patients, ipsilateral MEPs in the unaffected relaxed FDI (in biceps, 6 of 25 stroke patients) were evoked by stimulation of premotor areas of the affected hemisphere. Their latencies were shorter than those that MEPs evoked in the same muscle by stimulation of the motor cortex of the contralateral unaffected hemisphere. Such responses were never obtained in normal subjects and were mostly observed in patients with subcortical infarcts. Patients harboring these responses had slightly better bimanual dexterity after 6 months. Conclusions— Ipsilateral MEPs obtained in healthy individuals and stroke patients have different characteristics and probably different origins. In the former, they are probably conveyed via corticoreticulospinal or corticopropriospinal pathways, whereas in the latter, early ipsilateral MEPs could originate in hyperexcitable premotor areas.

[1]  C. Woolsey,et al.  The Pyramidal Tract , 1957, Neurology.

[2]  V. Meininger,et al.  Motor consequences of motor area ablations in man , 1977, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[3]  M Wiesendanger,et al.  Input and output organization of the supplementary motor area. , 1987, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  P. Nathan,et al.  The corticospinal tracts in man. Course and location of fibres at different segmental levels. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Fisher Cm,et al.  Concerning the Mechanism of Recovery in Stroke Hemiphegia , 1992 .

[7]  J. Talairach,et al.  Clinical consequences of corticectomies involving the supplementary motor area in man , 1977, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[8]  W. Fries,et al.  Motor responses after transcranial electrical stimulation of cerebral hemispheres with a degenerated pyramidal tract , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[9]  J Talairach,et al.  The supplementary motor area in man (anatomo-functional findings by stereoencephalography in epilepsy) , 1966 .

[10]  B R Rosen,et al.  Activation of distinct motor cortex regions during ipsilateral and contralateral finger movements. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R N Lemon,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  M Hallett,et al.  Inhibitory influence of the ipsilateral motor cortex on responses to stimulation of the human cortex and pyramidal tract , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  M Hallett,et al.  Dissociation of the pathways mediating ipsilateral and contralateral motor‐evoked potentials in human hand and arm muscles , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  M. Cowan,et al.  American Heart Association. , 2018, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.

[15]  B. Day,et al.  The effect of magnetic coil orientation on the latency of surface EMG and single motor unit responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  R. Porter,et al.  Corticospinal Function and Voluntary Movement , 1993 .

[17]  C. Fisher,et al.  Concerning the Mechanism of Recovery in Stroke Hemiphegia , 1992, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[18]  V E Amassian,et al.  Comparison of human transcallosal responses evoked by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  P. Delwaide,et al.  Mechanisms of Hand Motor Recovery after Stroke: An Electrophysiologic Study of Central Motor Pathways , 1997 .

[20]  D. Muller,et al.  Ontogeny of ipsilateral corticospinal projections: A developmental study with transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[21]  M. Hallett,et al.  Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on ipsilateral muscles , 1991, Neurology.

[22]  S. Telera,et al.  Ipsilateral motor activation in patients with cerebral gliomas , 1998, Neurology.

[23]  J. Forsström,et al.  Statistical variation of nerve conduction velocity An analysis in normal subjects and uraemic patients , 1977, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[24]  M. Cincotta,et al.  Abnormal projection of corticospinal tracts in a patient with congenital mirror movements , 1994, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  M. Hallett,et al.  Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  V. Hömberg,et al.  Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Georg Leonhardt,et al.  Evolution of functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke: A serial positron emission tomographic activation study , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[28]  M. Hallett,et al.  Congenital mirror movements. Abnormal organization of motor pathways in two patients. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Maeve O'Connor,et al.  Ciba Foundation Symposium 132 - Motor Areas of the Cerebral Cortex , 1987 .

[30]  J. Stephens,et al.  Mirror movements studied in a patient with Klippel‐Feil syndrome. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.