Responses from area 3b of somatosensory cortex to textured surfaces during active touch in primate.

(1) The purpose of this experiment was to characterize the responses of neurons in somatosensory cortex while the hand was actively moved (stroked) across a textured surface. Surfaces consisted of horizontal gratings that varied by spatial period or ridge-groove ratio (roughness). Surfaces were attached to rectangular blocks. TOP and BOTTOM halves of each block could contain surfaces of different roughness. (2) Velocity and force of the stroke were behaviorally constrained within certain limits and continuously measured and recorded during the stroke. (3) Response samples for each neuron were obtained for repeated presentations of each surface. Statistical analyses consisted of analysis of variance and t tests across surfaces on the data of each neuron, and summary statistics on groups of neurons with similar response characteristics. The interaction effects of behavioral variables (velocity and force) were examined and found not to be significant. (4) The sample mainly consisted of rapidly adapting neurons in area 3b of somatosensory area I (SI). Three main response types were found: (a) GRADED cells showed a monotonic increase in firing rate to increasingly rougher surfaces. This effect was seen in one-third of cells studied and is consistent with other reports. These cells seem to code roughness in the magnitude of their response. (b) In some cells, response to a BOTTOM surface depended on the roughness of the preceding TOP surface. This is analogous to contrast in the visual system. These CONTRAST cells are a novel finding in the somatosensory system. (c) Some cells only responded to surfaces that were completely smooth. These "OFF"-response-type cells were seen in proximity to other cells that responded in a reciprocal fashion to surfaces with ridges, but not to smooth surfaces. SMOOTH cells did not respond to punctate or passively applied stimuli, and therefore could not be classified by adaptation of the responses. (5) An increase in firing rate as spatial period (roughness) increases (with a constant ratio of ridge to groove) seems contrary to vibratory models of texture perception. As spatial period increases, temporal frequency decreases, and thus "tuned" cells should show a decreased response rate. Yet GRADED cells showed an increased response. In addition, response varied on surfaces with different groove size, where spatial period, and thus temporal period, was constant. This suggests that in rapidly adapting neurons, at least for these simple surfaces, texture is coded by the magnitude of the firing rates rather than by its temporal fidelity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  R. Erickson,et al.  Stimulus coding in topographic and nontopographic afferent modalities: on the significance of the activity of individual sensory neurons. , 1968, Psychological review.

[2]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Lamb Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  I. Darian‐Smith,et al.  Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving across the monkey's finger pad. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Tactual roughness perception in human: a psychophysical assessment of the role of vibration , 1985 .

[6]  Antony W. Goodwin,et al.  Scanning a textured surface with the fingers: events in sensorimotor cortex , 1985 .

[7]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Peripheral neural representation of spatial dimensions of a textured surface moving across the monkey's finger pad. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  K O Johnson,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille‐like dot patterns in the monkey. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  S. Lederman Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: The touching process and effects of macro- and microsurface structure , 1974 .

[10]  J. Ko Sensory discrimination: neural processes preceding discrimination decision. , 1980 .

[11]  L. E. Krueger David Katz’s Der Aufbau der Tastwelt (The world of touch): A synopsis , 1970 .

[12]  S. Lederman,et al.  The role of vibration in the tactual perception of roughness , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  K O Johnson,et al.  Sensory discrimination: decision process. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Lamb,et al.  Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: peripheral neural coding in the monkey. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  D. Katz Der Aufbau der Tastwelt , 1925 .

[16]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[17]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch , 1972 .