Evaluation of a portable nephelometer against the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance method for monitoring PM(2.5).

Monitoring personal exposure to particle matter (PM(2.5)) in ambient air requires performing measurements using portable monitors. In this work, the portable nephelometer SidePak™ AM510 Personal Aerosol Monitor manufactured by TSI Inc. was evaluated against a Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM) equipped with a Filter Dynamics Measurements System (FDMS). Conventionally, the SidePak is calibrated with respect to the Arizona Road Test Dust and then multiplied by an environmental calibration factor to yield mass concentration. To adapt this calibration to specific field conditions, we present an implementation of this calibration by introducing a growing factor correction which takes into account relative humidity and the dry and wet portions of the refractive index estimated from TEOM-FDMS measurements. PM(2.5) sampling with several SidePaks AM510 was carried out in background and rural sites in the Po Valley (Italy). Modeled SidePak data were plotted vs. reference TEOM-FDMS data which show a good agreement.

[1]  Xavier Simon,et al.  Workplace aerosol mass concentration measurement using optical particle counters. , 2012, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[2]  M. Mochida,et al.  Assessment of the aerosol water content in urban atmospheric particles by the hygroscopic growth measurements in Sapporo, Japan , 2009 .

[3]  R. Burnett,et al.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. , 2002, JAMA.

[4]  Olivier Favez,et al.  Characterization and contribution to PM2.5 of semi-volatile aerosols in Paris (France) , 2007 .

[5]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  An Inexpensive Dual-Chamber Particle Monitor: Laboratory Characterization , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  H Patashnick,et al.  Development of a Sample Equilibration System for the TEOM Continuous PM Monitor , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  Stephen Greaves,et al.  Exploring variability in pedestrian exposure to fine particulates (PM2.5) along a busy road , 2008 .

[8]  Derek E. Day,et al.  Aerosol light scattering measurements as a function of relative humidity : a comparison between measurements made at three different sites , 2001 .

[9]  P. Görner,et al.  Photometer measurement of polydisperse aerosols , 1995 .

[10]  Ju-Myon Park Assessment of suspended dust from pipe rattling operations , 2006 .

[11]  K. Berhane,et al.  The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  W G Kreyling,et al.  Daily mortality and fine and ultrafine particles in Erfurt, Germany part I: role of particle number and particle mass. , 2000, Research report.

[13]  Yangang Liu,et al.  Relationship of refractive index to mass density and self-consistency of mixing rules for multicomponent mixtures like ambient aerosols , 2008 .

[14]  H. Jonsson,et al.  Influence of humidity on the aerosol scattering coefficient and its effect on the upwelling radiance during ACE-2 , 2000 .

[15]  N. Takegawa,et al.  Hygroscopic growth of tropospheric particle number size distributions over the North China Plain , 2009 .

[16]  D. Zmirou-Navier,et al.  Can we use fixed ambient air monitors to estimate population long-term exposure to air pollutants? The case of spatial variability in the Genotox ER study. , 2005, Environmental research.

[17]  B. Tomkins,et al.  Development and Application of Protocols for the Determination of Response of Real-Time Particle Monitors to Common Indoor Aerosols , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[18]  A. Gromov,et al.  Characterization of Test Dust for Product Qualification , 2008 .

[19]  G. M. Hale,et al.  Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-microm Wavelength Region. , 1973, Applied optics.

[20]  Eger,et al.  Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  P. Zieger Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering , 2011 .

[22]  Simon Kingham,et al.  Winter comparison of TEOM, MiniVol and DustTrak PM10 monitors in a woodsmoke environment , 2006 .

[23]  Ralf Zimmermann,et al.  Seasonal and diurnal variation of PM2.5 apparent particle density in urban air in Augsburg, Germany. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  E. P. Weijersa,et al.  Variability of particulate matter concentrations along roads and motorways determined by a moving measurement unit , 2004 .

[25]  D. Dockery,et al.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  J. Morin,et al.  On-road measurements of particle number concentrations and size distributions in urban and tunnel environments , 2004 .

[27]  Sheldon Landsberger,et al.  Characterization of the Gent Stacked Filter Unit PM10 Sampler , 1997 .

[28]  Jenny L. Hand,et al.  Review of aerosol mass scattering efficiencies from ground-based measurements since 1990 , 2007 .

[29]  Mark J. Rood,et al.  Mixtures of pollution, dust, sea salt, and volcanic aerosol during ACE‐Asia: Radiative properties as a function of relative humidity , 2003 .

[30]  A. Rimm,et al.  Air pollution and emergency department visits for asthma among Ohio Medicaid recipients, 1991-1996. , 2003, Environmental research.

[31]  R. Sarda-Estève,et al.  Semi‐volatile aerosols in Beijing (R.P. China): Characterization and influence on various PM2.5 measurements , 2007 .

[32]  I. Beverland,et al.  Intercomparison of five PM10 monitoring devices and the implications for exposure measurement in epidemiological research. , 2000, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[33]  A. R. Ravishankara,et al.  Key factors influencing the relative humidity dependence of aerosol light scattering , 2006 .