Comparison of the HiFocus Mid-Scala and HiFocus 1J Electrode Array: Angular Insertion Depths and Speech Perception Outcomes

The HiFocus Mid-Scala (MS) electrode array has recently been introduced onto the market. This precurved design with a targeted mid-scalar intracochlear position pursues an atraumatic insertion and optimal distance for neural stimulation. In this study we prospectively examined the angular insertion depth achieved and speech perception outcomes resulting from the HiFocus MS electrode array for 6 months after implantation, and retrospectively compared these with the HiFocus 1J lateral wall electrode array. The mean angular insertion depth within the MS population (n = 96) was found at 470°. This was 50° shallower but more consistent than the 1J electrode array (n = 110). Audiological evaluation within a subgroup, including only postlingual, unilaterally implanted, adult cochlear implant recipients who were matched on preoperative speech perception scores and the duration of deafness (MS = 32, 1J = 32), showed no difference in speech perception outcomes between the MS and 1J groups. Furthermore, speech perception outcome was not affected by the angular insertion depth or frequency mismatch.

[1]  M. Carlson,et al.  Evaluation of a new mid‐scala cochlear implant electrode using microcomputed tomography , 2015, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  David M Landsberger,et al.  Perceptual changes in place of stimulation with long cochlear implant electrode arrays. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  K. Green,et al.  Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults , 2007, Cochlear implants international.

[4]  A. Aschendorff,et al.  The New Mid-Scala Electrode Array: A Radiologic and Histologic Study in Human Temporal Bones , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  G. M. Clark,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation , 1993, Hearing Research.

[6]  F B van der Beek,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and Without Positioner , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[7]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: How and why , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  Margaret W. Skinner,et al.  CT-Derived Estimation of Cochlear Morphology and Electrode Array Position in Relation to Word Recognition in Nucleus-22 Recipients , 2002, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[9]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour ™ electrodes , 2005, Hearing Research.

[10]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma , 2006, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes , 2014, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea , 2014, Hearing Research.

[13]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[14]  Peter Nopp,et al.  Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results. , 2003, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Cochlear Coordinates in Regard to Cochlear Implantation: A Clinically Individually Applicable 3 Dimensional CT-Based Method , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[16]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation – fact or fantasy? , 2006, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  René H Gifford,et al.  Implications of Minimizing Trauma During Conventional Cochlear Implantation , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[18]  Berit M. Verbist,et al.  The Influence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Position on Performance , 2015, Audiology and Neurotology.

[19]  W Baumgartner,et al.  Cochlear implant deep electrode insertion: extent of insertional trauma. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[20]  J. Firszt,et al.  Electrophysiologic Effects of Placing Cochlear Implant Electrodes in a Perimodiolar Position in Young Children , 2004, The Laryngoscope.

[21]  W. Parkinson,et al.  Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. , 1999, The American journal of otology.

[22]  G M Clark,et al.  Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[23]  Gregory Valentini,et al.  Implications of Deep Electrode Insertion on Cochlear Implant Fitting , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[24]  D. D. Greenwood.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  L Whitford,et al.  Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. , 1996, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[26]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[27]  R. Joemai,et al.  Electrode Migration in Cochlear Implant Patients: Not an Exception , 2012, Audiology and Neurotology.

[28]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[29]  John S. Oghalai,et al.  Predicting the effect of post-implant cochlear fibrosis on residual hearing , 2005, Hearing Research.

[30]  Karen M Mispagel,et al.  Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[31]  Kumiko Yukawa,et al.  Effects of Insertion Depth of Cochlear Implant Electrodes upon Speech Perception , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[32]  R. Wolterbeek,et al.  Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[33]  A. Ernst,et al.  Electrode Migration in Patients with Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes , 2015, Audiology and Neurotology.

[34]  Johan H M Frijns,et al.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[35]  Bernard Fraysse,et al.  The Size of the Cochlea and Predictions of Insertion Depth Angles for Cochlear Implant Electrodes , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[36]  Paul J Abbas,et al.  Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  A. Bacciu,et al.  The Nucleus Contour Electrode Array: An Electrophysiological Study , 2002, The Laryngoscope.

[38]  J. J. Grote,et al.  The Importance of Human Cochlear Anatomy for the Results of Modiolus-Hugging Multichannel Cochlear Implants , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[39]  PerrI'A.,et al.  Improved and Simplified Methods for Specifying Positions of the Electrode Bands of a Cochlear Implant Array Audiology , 2009 .

[40]  David M Landsberger,et al.  The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants , 2015, Ear and hearing.